Quote:
Originally Posted by U376977
The Bible "clearly" states "skins" but does not state animal skins. I agree with Baron and Ferd that the context of the traditional assumption that it was an animal skin makes the most sense. But still it is an interesting thought--that the original creation was likened unto the glorified body of Christ and that fallen man caused us to be "born in sin and shapen in iniquity."
The "celestial" body thought comes from 1 Cor. 15. |
But from
1 Cor 15 we have this: 47The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven.
further, the context of
Gen 3:21 requires the skin there to be something other than human epidermis because it follows the creation of man in Chapter 2. primarily
bone and flesh. but since you bring up
1 Cor 15, the context of that chapater further concludes that Adam was "terestrial"
this teaching your friend is looking at has been taught by the likes of William Branham. i would consider it a door to very bad things.
Threaded Mode
