Quote:
Originally Posted by trfrance
it's clear? Really? Great.
I assume that to you it's clear too then.
Now lets recap from just the first 40 posts of people reading this thread, trying to figure out where he stood on the issue:
Sam wasn't sure.
I wasnt sure initially
epley wasnt sure (at least initially)
deltaguitar thought it had a "oneness slant" (<---his own words)
1399 didnt seem to be sure either...
Neither was st mark (he suggested a member of scott's church "could clear this up" for us).
Multiple people read it and werent sure exactly what dscott's position was....but to you it's just "clear"? Well that's pretty impressive then if that's the case.
So explain to us then, jt .... Is his article clearly oneness, or clearly trinitarian? Break it down for us, if you dont mind.
|
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Threaded Mode
