|
Re: The History of Men's Clothing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447
What I find interesting is that women always where fully gowned. Not the exposing you have today with little excercise shorts etc... You also did not see FORM fitting clothes on women like pants. Again I don't draw the line on a SPLIT between the legs though I believe it is more modest in most cases for the most part. As long as it is very loose and not form fitting(loose gauchos) I don't have a issue.
hmmm lets's start a thread also on the early churches historical opinion on makeup, jewelry and other things.... I don't think you LIBS would like that one.
|
Why are form fitting clothes on a man OK, but not on a woman? To be consistent, shouldn't all form fitting clothes be equally forbidden?
__________________
Words: For when an emoticon just isn't enough.
|
Threaded Mode
