I think I have to mention something here. I'm seeing a lot of people personally attacking the individual asking the question instead of answering the question asked. The original post was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristopherHall
|
After reviewing the article I think it should be discussed outside of attacking the one asking the question for merely asking the question. I wonder, is our refusal to even seriously consider the moral implications of what is presented here a validation of the point made? Are we too willing to look the other way if it saves us money?