No, I didn't say harsh and malicious. I think Chan is way over the top with his persistence. It's enough to state your views once and let them be heard. But what does Chancellor have to do with Coonskinner and rrford?
Why are they all being lumped together? I disagree with Rhoni on a number of issues. Does that mean I'm also going to be called harsh?
Chancellor posted his disagreements in the same way, in the same fashion, with the same persistence and frequency on the NFCF and FCF. It's to be expected. So I am not even addressing his posts in my assessment of the thread.
Heated disagreement does not equate abuse. That's just my opinion. I'm straightforward and blunt, but I do not believe I have ever posted a single post that could be called abusive, and I certainly have never posted a single post that I am ashamed of. And yet, there are probably some who would label me as a Big Fat Meanie, and when they do I say "go ahead", because I like the way I post, and if that makes me a BFM then I embrace the term, because I believe I am a godly person and my posts reflect it.
I think it's great that you and Daniel and J-Roc have decided to be Rhoni's defenders, and I assume you feel she is a damsel in distress. Be her heroes. Go for it. Just don't be upset when others don't hold the universal opinion that you are being heroic.
Just to clarify, previously I had only skimmed a few posts on the thread, and this morning I only read a couple, as I stated to you in PM. However, I have spent the last 45 minutes reading the thread more thoroughly, particularly posts by CS, rrford, Malvaro and Rhoni's responses to them, so I think I'm qualified to offer my opinion.
My sympathies don't really lie with Rhoni here. Does that mean I'm a meanie?
Threaded Mode
