Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
BD ... separates the aspect of Oneness Christological doctrine w/ Oneness soteriological doctrine ... he feels that the truth of the Godhead has survived through time... the only flaws w/ this argument are:
1. He also maintains that God's full truth has survived the generations ... but his witnesses seem to only have partial truth.
|
I am primarily dealing with the monarchian doctrine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
2. Oneness PAJC doctrine is by definition linked not only to their view of the Godhead but also by the necessity of Jesus name baptism for the remission of sins.
|
Well, since I am not PAJC, does that mean that I am not bound by this definition? I do affirm Jesus name baptism, and the infilling of the Holy Ghost, but I DO have my own independent ideas about that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
3. Many of the examples he gives hold heretical Christological views
|
This is an unfair statement unless you are willing or able to provide proof that they indeed hold "heretical" christological views. I perceive that if you and I discussed christology, either you and/or I would be accused by the other of holding "heretical" christological views... my point being that simply making an accusation is meaningless without real substance. I suggest that far fewer of their christological views are "heretical" than one might think!
Threaded Mode
