Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
For what it's worth: I have observed two posters - SISTER Murphy and Phil Jones make some very damning and hurtful charges on this thread. It's still early, but I wonder if we will see the usual game played out here-
The "conservatives" falsely charge their brethren with an innuendo and then those brethren respond asking for clarification and challenging the "conservatives" to actually take a stand on principle.
Then the "conservatives" drop out of the thread altogether and refuse to take ownership for their own words against their brethren, only to pop up on some other thread and do the same thing all over again. They did this on FCF, they do this on other apostolic boards... I'm waiting to see what happens here.
For the record: Sister Murphy made a 1 to 1 comparison between Lady Rev's ministry and the criminal act of giving drugs and alcohol to children.
When I compared lady Rev's kids waving sticks to the disciples waving palm branches Phil Jones called me "intentionally obtuse."
My challenge: Is the ministry of Lady Rev comparable to the criminal enticement of children; or is Lady Rev's ministry more along the lines of the disciples of Jesus Christ as described in the Gospel of Luke? Perhaps you have an alternative view?
Lady Rev has answered for herself. Phil, SISTER Murphy?
|
YOU are the obtuse individual in this thread, friend. I was addressing a mindset, a philosophy, an idea, (that being that we must do whatever we can to keep kids entertained in church or they won't stay in church), and comparing it to the same mindset, philosophy, idea that my mother-in-law espoused (have to do whatever I can to keep my boys at home, even if that means supplying them with drugs and alcohol). Are you truly so dense that you can't comprehend such a simple comparison of philosophy?
Threaded Mode
