Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery
Your perspective is silly.
The church writers said it, but I don't like them, so they don't count. The issue is that this is historic Christian doctrine, orthodox, heretic, whatever, linking the sinlessness of Jesus with the virgin birth.
Honestly, Esais, your posts here have been among your worst, and I hope others that are actually interested in the topic will now come on board.
Your seed of Abraham idea was also really silly, you do realize that the issue is the physical transmission of seed.
|
Sorry you perceive me as silly because I don't accept as gospel truth things said by proto-catholic apologists and theologians.
I notice you haven't dealt with the SCRIPTURAL side of the issue, but want to stay focused on some 4th century Roman author whose actual identity is unknown.
Of course I realise the issue is the physical transmission of seed. And the Scripture says He took on Him the seed of Abraham. The wording flies contrary to what would be expected if the apostle agreed with Custance's ideas concerning the sin nature.
But since I am silly, I will leave you to your thread.
Threaded Mode
