Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1
This is a perfect example of the ridiculous snarky responses that has driven AFF into the ground. I suppose discussing how sermons on CD is superior to sermons on cassette is just fine but if a person mentions the quality of video equipment and the quality of the stream of video somehow that deserves your ridiculous comment.
Whether a person is hearing the word of God in person, on radio, cassette, CD, YouTube, Holy Ghost Radio, Video Webstreaming, or two tin cans with a string tied between them does not "enhance your understanding of and obedience to the word of God". The word of God is the word of God and the power is there regardless of the method a person is hearing it.
However it is nice to be able to enjoy in real tme as clear and as immersive experience as possible to the service / word of God and that is what POA's quality webstream allows. There is nothing wrong with something being high quality.
|
Nope. It's stupid snotty remarks like yours that have driven this place into the ground. Like all liberals, you suffer from a complete lack of tolerance of contrary opinions. My statement was not about sound quality on one medium vs sound quality on another. Nor was it about the virtues of "high quality" vs some luddite low-fi pursuit.
But thanks for keeping the lights on, anyway.