|
Re: convoluted and shifty
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery
It is only your confused, circular, ignorant fantasy that the Ten Commandments atr called the “old covenant”.
Hebrews 8:13
In that he saith,
A new covenant, he hath made the first old.
Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away. |
You are missing consistently the same thing Paul's detractors missed. You think removal of the law means acceptance and allowance for sin. No. You miss the point as Esaias does that the problem with Law was not the Law. It was man's sin. And the METHOD of taking sinful men and making them merely refuse to sin and instead obey DOES NOT WORK. It works on paper alone. ANd by the same token, you confuse what it means to walk after the flesh as though it does not INCLUDE self making self-righteous through obedient works. the entire concept you overlook is that Law is good, but the method and serving manner of law makes it not work. You miss the entire concept that I presented in my thread about walking after the flesh being law-keeping.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
Threaded Mode
