Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
Actually, we'll get to the crux of the truth, because you're being an incessant liar in your slander of me, and back tracking to cover your lies.
|
I'm not backtracking. I stand by everything I've posted. Any search of your posts will show I'm not lying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
1.) Did I say that protest should be brought into churches? Yes.
|
At least you admit it now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
2.) Did I argue for "left-wing political protests"? No!
|
Semantics. You know good and well the overwhelming majority of apostolic/pentecostal churches are conservative. As such, any protest would be from radical, left-wing liberals like you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
Saying that I can see how an unhinged individual could justify a terrible action doesn't mean that I agree with the unhinged man's logic.
|
And yet you continue to post justification of violence against conservatives without any condemnation. You go on and on talking about how you can understand why someone would kill a conservative while not one time do you condemn it in this post. And in the Scalise thread it took multiple posts calling you out for you to finally condemn violence against conservatives.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
I don't even own a weapon. And I have no interest in owning a weapon.
|
That's good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
I've discussed common law marriage and its historical foundations and merits. But I've never claimed to be married under "common law". I've explained that I was married in accordance to the Quaker tradition of marrying couples in care of the meeting. It is a government-free religious marriage. Some call them "Quaker marriages". So, either you weren't paying enough attention to be trusted to comment on what I've said, or your deliberately twisting the truth.
|
So then you and your fiance met and spoke with the "cleanness committee" who allowed you both to be married and appointed time during the monthly meeting for the wedding? I'm sure you have a Quaker marriage certificate as well, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
Slander. Does that not call for a misrepresentation of the person, much like you're misrepresenting me? If I say I think Trump is an idiot, I'm just expressing an opinion. You're free to say that you think Trump is an anointed super genius. LOL Now, if I claim that Trump raped my goldfish and should be tried for animal cruelty, that is slander.
|
Slander is not only misrepresentation or lies. Slander also includes speaking ill/evil of or to sully someone's reputation, which you do on a constant basis.