Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
This should be viewed as an insult to anyone - con or non. Unfortunately, this type of post is the norm for cons. They don't consider this kind of post an insult, though it is. They claim they're just posting "the truth." Nons are cast to hell, told they're backslidden, reprobate, on and on. None of that is considered an insult. No...it's "the truth." (As viewed by cons, not the Word)
|
So, are you saying we should never acknowledge if someone is headed for hell? What about if someone claims to be Holy Ghost filled, but lives in homosexuality? Or is addicted to porn? Or is lusting after another? Would it be an insult to say they're backslid and headed for hell? Or would that simply be the truth?
I'm not saying anyone is, just asking hypothetically. Now, obviously there is a proper way and a wrong way to say it, but just because some address the issues improperly (i.e. not from a spirit of meekness and love), does it make the statement itself wrong?
I'm just trying to understand what specifically you think we all should be objecting to (and I mean that sincerely, not facetiously). The statement itself, or the spirit in which you perceive it to be delivered? Or something else entirely that I'm not seeing?
Threaded Mode
