Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
BTW, David, Why aren't you hammering Marco Rubio who voted FOR the bad deals that were added. He was the deciding win vote of 60.
|
I read they only needed 51 votes for it to pass, but regardless, I already noted that Rubio didn't even read the bill. The only reason I'm "hammering" Cruz is for his position and unfortunate statement about the bill.
I still like Cruz, I just don't get why politicians will made bad deals on bills like this. There shouldn't be a question on voting against it, especially when you make a statement about how bad it is. Makes no sense to me.
"This is a bad bill! It's an awful bill! But I'm still going to vote for it unless I'm forced not to."
smh
Threaded Mode
