Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 05-01-2015, 10:27 AM
n david n david is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17,807
Re: Lee Stoneking Addresses UN

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam View Post
No, a meeting doesn't have to be filled with members in order to be an official session. As exampled by my Ted Cruz note. I hope you don't think I was helping you (except for helping you say the above idiocy)
You've proven my point. The Senate was in session, Cruz was speaking to the Senate regardless of whether or not Senators filled the room.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam View Post
It doesn't matter what the title of the meeting was. Nobody attended. If nobody attended, you didn't address anybody. I don't have to prove it was or was not official, I just had to show clear footage that nobody was addressed.
It does matter what the United Nations says it was. Only to you it may not matter. But you don't care for facts or the truth.

You hate what Stoneking did. You hate that Wilson is giving Bible Studies, conducting services and baptizing muslims who also receive the Holy Ghost.

So facts be damned! You will lie, mislead, libel and do anything you can to try and downplay the significance of Stoneking's message to the General Assembly and what is happening at the UN.

People did attend. You're lying if you claim no one did. Also it was broadcasted live via webcast and was available to delegates, member representatives and the general public around the world.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam View Post
For someone to address the members the members have to be there.
There you go again, trying to change the argument. You initially claimed it wasn't a meeting of the 69th Session of the General Assembly...now you've changed it to [paraphrase] "the members weren't there so he didn't address the members."

First, the members could have been watching via the live streaming webcast. I can't confirm they did, but you can't claim they didn't.

There were some delegates there.

Also, the argument isn't whether he addressed the members. You're trying to change it to that, but that wasn't the argument. The initial argument was whether this was an official meeting of the General Assembly.

And the UN says it was.

Last edited by n david; 05-01-2015 at 10:41 AM.
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newt addresses NRA like no candiate in 24 years Pressing-On Political Talk 18 04-17-2012 01:16 PM
Ronald Reagan Addresses The UPC, 1988 Scott Hutchinson Fellowship Hall 0 12-11-2008 07:55 PM
Is the Web Running out of IP Addresses? JaneEyre Fellowship Hall 1 09-25-2008 07:33 PM
Dave Bernard addresses beards freeatlast Fellowship Hall 542 06-10-2007 09:47 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.