Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
You have the pedophile prophet and I'm the one with an obsession? 
Yes. You do have one. You focus on sex and sex with children like a fixed laser.
Walks, your posted scriptures give a progression of history of Israel, starting from their henotheist patriarch who is beckoned by God to leaves his pagan roots of Ur of the Chaldees to follow God. You then post (a later history) of the Law of Moses, where God takes the people who were Abraham's descendants and gives them the LAW. You do she a progression there in the Hebrew Bible?
Yet, still cannot see how he progression of the pagan Abraham justifies your Mohammed consummating his marriage with Aisha at the age of nine?
The child brides in your religion are brought about because the leader of your religion had a child bride. |
That's what I said. Thanks.
Are you claiming now that Abraham could not have known it was a sin and it actually was not a written and defined sin until the LAW was given by God? Are you claiming that nobody at the time was in a position to even define it as a sin? It just happened that Abraham married his half-sister because it was culturally acceptable at the time? Is this the reason that even though Abraham twice sort of "pimped" his wife (half-sister) off because he was afraid he would be killed for her God intervened on both occasions and blessed this marriage and made sure she was returned to Him, even though under God's law the marriage itself is a sin? That God overlooked this in favor of Abraham's commitment to Him?
Good. We are in agreement. With that said you were tasked (8 times now speaking of counting the number of times it takes to get someone to answer a question) to
go and fetch the LAW on marriage that defines the sin of marriage to a young girl, in or preceding the 8th century because the law concerning who can and cannot marry is spelled out both in the bible and Quran and neither define an "age". Because there WAS a law and there WAS a church at that time, unlike in the time of Abraham, so there were hundreds of years available for this "discovery" of the meaning of Ezekiel to be made.
So: If you cannot go and get it and you cannot find it and share it you're nothing better than a travelling four-flushing snake oil salesman. A showman. A fake. A court jester. A joke who believes you are exalted to define what is "sin" all on your own.
Otherwise, I fetched the law that
is available, all of it. Despite your rabbinical claim I guess (
since you dropped it like a hot iron) you must concur on that jewish law thing. (you won't admit you were wrong but I will cheerfully point that out for you. Least I can do. No problem. Really.)
You never answered Canon law nor did you provide anything remotely parallel to it from the church, any church. There is not a single verse outside of a parable in Ezekiel that only you but not the rest of the jewish or christian community has ever made a rule, or determination that this is REALLY what that verse means through all of history all the way up through colonial America.
Innocently wondering - suddenly you are quiet? no comments on taxes? location? mosques? age? No more evangelies about jewish laws or practices? Que pasa senor?
I know right? Ouch. You find that pharmacy?
This is the wrong place for you senor. You aren't getting anywhere here.
Threaded Mode
