Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
You obviously are not following the case. The teachers that testified said that GZ was wanting to study to be a Prosecutor, not a cop. The HO wanted to outfit GZ with a uniform and car, for his neighborhood watch business, and he declined the offer.
When GZ's life was comprised, he then is on self-defense. And as the Defense stated in closing arguments today - "We have the injuries to prove our client was sucker punched." That means he is now in self-defense mode and should be acquitted.
I will say that anyone or group that threatens to riot are a bunch of barbaric people, and need to be shot.
|
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/...mmerman-trial/
If there is an acquittal, if there is a protest
that is peaceful in the Sanford-Orlando area, I will be there.
For me, this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment.
I'll say again, a full acquittal in this situation will open the door for "legalized" gun-toting vigilantism-- as long as you kill the subject and as long as there aren't any witnesses to say otherwise, you can do what you want under the guise of "neighborhood watch".