Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeHardy07
Here is what I did not say: Paul is stupid. Paul was a raving idiot. Tongues are irrelevant.
Here is what I did say(or tried to say): The heavenly tongues idea is not an important issue.
There is plenty of evidence to support earthly languages. Acts 2 and 1 Cor. 14 both read extensively on the subject. There is no such detailing of this, and this is funny, man-made "heavenly language." I'd probably be correct in saying that this counterfeit was created somewhere near the early 20th century.
There may very well be a heavenly language, but it, or our idea of it, has become some trophy to be obtained to the point that we threaten people's salvation and spirituality with it.
It's ridiculous. |
What does this statement of yours mean? I guess I'm interpreting you to say either camp (for or against) heavenly language has no support
I'd say neither camp has much of anything to back up an argument on this. So, I say if an extraterrestrial language was needed for salvation or even super-spirituality, it would have been further covered in the Word.
Besides who said these tongues that are initially there with the infilling of the Holy Ghost is a heavenly language?
Threaded Mode
