PAJC- THIEVES, LIARS, and HYPOCRITES

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by MrMasterMind

PAJC- Thieves, Liars, and Hypocrites

Unfortunately, there is no other conclusion based on the postings of PAJC progeny and their revisionist leaders/historians. (Including UPC leaders, Bible school teachers, and even some GIBs)

What postings? Where? Who? Do you have some quotes?

It is indisputable that the PCI was better organized and funded at the time of the merger. They even had headquarters, offices, and the like, whereas the PAJC did not.

I can't dispute or confirm this because I have nothing to go on other than your insistence that it is "indisputable"

According to the revisionists, the PAJC leaders felt from the beginning that the PCI’s theology was in error and they were lost. Furthermore, the unity clause was merely to give them time to come around to PAJC way of thinking or the time would come would come when they would be expelled. (Or excreted depending on which Westburg-ite was speaking.)

Who? When? Where? What? Who are the "revisionists"? What are they saying? Do you have citations? References? Quotes?

They were hypocrites of the worst sort. To their face they told the PCI brethren that they were just that- brothers in Christ, but really believed them to be lost and hell bound. Perhaps even worse, as they were preachers leading others astray.

As above, do you have more information for the rest of us who have no idea what you are talking about?

Revisionists also claim their forefathers made a mistake, the merger never should have happened, and the heretics never should have been let in.

Same as before, citations please?

On the other hand, if you believe like I do, that the merger was sincere; that they believed the PCI were brethren; that it was not as important whether baptism in Jesus’ name was because sins had been remitted or whether it was done to remit sins, as much as the fact both taught baptism in Jesus’ name as a commandment. Then the revisionists are mistaken and the PAJC was not a bunch of thieves, liars, and hypocrites after all.

I Don't see how what you believe changes your first assertion into merely being mistaken and not rather a bunch of thieves, liars and hypocrites. In fact if what you believe is true of the PCI and the merger this would be counted as evidence of your first assertion, given you can provide evidence that they are revisionists...whoever "they" are