Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
 I wondered what "hallow" meant in regard to my smilie, but I just quoted it as such. 
As for the one on one, not yet. I feel like as long as we're discussing the issue based on the Bible thats fine, but as for getting into some of this other stuff, I am admittedly not prepared at this point for a formal style debate. My issues with yours and Praxs' evolution is that it doesn't line up with scripture. Not necessarily carbon dating, fossil record, magnetic force, etc. I'm not able to speak much to those topics at this point. What I do know is that the Bible teaches a literal 6 day creation. So I continue to stand by my comment that to deny that is to deny scripture. Perhaps not the whole of scripture, for I know neither you nor Praxeas denies the whole of scripture, but really you guys theories concerning creation are anti-biblical. |
Haeckels drawings of embryos
This is what textbooks claim is Proooof.
Darwin said that a human baby was proof in the womb. It had a long tail and was evolving from a fish to a normal human.
Eugenie Scott is a flaming atheist that speaks in the video, She is both wrong and defensive.
Picking and tricking sketches to support the theory is another reason we see they are not scientific. Genetics refute haeckels in every way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecH5SKxL9wk
Threaded Mode
