Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla."
Chapter 7
-states that he will describe the differences between the sub-species (races) of man
http://ministries.tliquest.net/theol...%20Racism.html
As the founder of a religious cult, Darwin has some extreme and dangerous positions
I see Darwinism is bad science and horrific ideology. I can see people with high moral values run from these demonic positions. He was a very sick man.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie
Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
"crack pipe coadie." That's you. And everyone else agrees. Lamentably.
We all want the very best for you, but you have to want that as well.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie
This is getting a little trashy and i suspect prax condones it
|
I'll make a deal with you. I will FOREVER stop calling you
"crack pipe coadie" if you do the following:
1) Show us how Zerubbabel could possibly be literally descended from the paternal lines of both Solomon and Nathan, the sons of King David.
(See
Matthew 1;
Luke 3;
1 Chronicles 3;
Haggai 1:1-2:23 and
Zechariah 4:6-14).
2) Select a single fossil from the list I gave you at Wikipedia (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...tional_fossils) and demonstrate why this fossil DOES NOT represent a transitional form as predicted by Charles Darwin.
Deal?
Threaded Mode
