Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 07-29-2008, 08:21 AM
Adino's Avatar
Adino Adino is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,099
Re: Martin Luther on Christian Baptism: IT SAVES!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by RevDWW View Post
He that doesn't beleive is not going to be baptized so there is not reason to state, he that believes not and is baptized not shall be damned.

A ring is not necessary part of the wedding covenant, but baptism is essential to the new birth. It's pretty simple, you are not part of the covenant if you do not act out what is needed to be part of the covenant. You could be born into the nation of Israel but you where not a partaker in Abraham's covenant if you where not circumcised in the foreskin. The circumcision or token of the new covenant, is preform without hands in baptism.

Logic works if you think logically.
Apparently you missed the point, Bro.. Mark 16:16 is a compound conditional sentence and the second part of that compound, "and is baptized" does not necessitate its connection to "shall be saved." Just like my example "He that is married by a preacher and puts on a ring shall be wed" does not necessitate the putting on of the ring in order to be wed. The ring stands as a token of the union, not as a cause of that union. Baptism does the same, it stands as a testimonial of the union but does not effect the union in any way.
"The one who believes AND is baptized shall be saved." There is a very important principle with respect to compound conditional statements: "A compound protasis ("The one who believes AND is baptized") does not necessarily mean that both conditions have the same relation to the apodosis" ("shall be saved.") [from Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics, (Zondervan, 1996), p.684.]
"The order, pisteusas (the one who believes) before baptistheis (the one who is baptized), and perhaps also the absence of any me baptistheis (one who is NOT baptized) answering to apistesas (the one who does not believe), rule out a magical, mechanical conception of baptism." [C.E.B. Cranfield, The Cambridge Greek Testament Commentary, (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1966), p. 474.]
The secondary condition of being baptized simply cannot be automatically connected to "shall be saved" in Mark 16:16. It would be a mistake to do so.

Yes, it would be nice if logic ruled the day.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What Is Your Baptism Story? CC1 Fellowship Hall 67 10-17-2011 09:20 PM
I've Got it. Gene Martin Scott Hutchinson Fellowship Hall 0 06-07-2008 10:11 PM
music for baptism Bev The Music Room 3 03-31-2008 05:09 AM
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. TalkLady Fellowship Hall 43 01-21-2008 08:15 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.