Quote:
Originally Posted by timlan2057
I'm surprised Bernard responded at all; much less in such depth.
Before I make any comment on the content of his response, I'm curious about a couple things:
Now according to Riggen, he turned Reckart's membership request down at CAF so I'll assume that Reckart is not a member there.
So are you saying here that these accusations were made solely by Reckart and Smith and NOT by ANY member of CAF?
I wonder at this because I think I could say without reservation that Bernard would never take the time to write such a detailed response to a couple off-the-wall characters like Reckart and Smith.
In fact, I don't think Bernard would relieve himself on them if they were on fire. And I don't blame him. I wouldn't either.
Now Bernard didn't say that - I did.
Is Bernard a member of CAF?
Where was Bernard's response originally written and if Bernard is not a member of CAF, then how did he read the accusations against him?
Sorry, but I just do not believe Bernard would take the time to write this solely in response to Reckart.
I'm even surprised he took the time to respond to UPC ministers on CAF.
|
Legitimate questions and observations ...
I think ...based on a comment RevRandy made in this thread that this was a case of dogpiling.
I don't see why a man of his gravitas would stoop to answer these "accusations". His body of work stands for itself.
Threaded Mode
