data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4a02/d4a0242b3d1d4ec6d6af2055ff037ad6d71769ba" alt="Old"
09-03-2007, 11:20 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77a08/77a0813437aaf813c50feb4972cd80b3a9d02dc1" alt="pelathais's Avatar" |
Accepts all friends requests
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
lol...see? And there were three persons that asked, Rico makes the third one
|
Well... just to take this thread off the original topic and go along with the topic under discussion...
The way I had almost exclusively heard the word used (in this type of application) was when a woman was referring to her husband. This would be a respectful way for a lady speaker to show she was "under submission" to her "head," i.e.: her husband. By extrapolation I've then heard the term used by ministers to refer to their boards and/or leaders- those to whom they are accountable in this life.
When the term was first used here, the thought crossed my mind of a male "pastor" (called a "he") who had a "covering" - that is a husband. I quickly eliminated that possibility- just because I didn't want to really go "there."
For a minister to refer to his "flock" as his covering, I think would show a profound sense of service on the part of that minister. But to be honest, I've never heard it used that way before.
|