A question regarding women wearing pants...

[OP_Carl]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

UUURRRRRGGGGG - wrong answer.

Read it again, a little more slowly. What spirit was behind the introduction, into the world of fashion, of pants for women?

Men have A LOT more to show in pants than women will ever be able to. A man sitting on the platform in pants many times leaves nothing to the imagination. Talk about accentuating the groin.....be real.

Your reaction proves my point. Women aren't usually 'stimulated' visually. Often what they see disgusts them.

Why don't we state it more acurately.....men are just more visual than women. A man seeing the back side of a woman whether in a dress snuggly fitting or pants is appealing to a man.

If it helps you. But I already did. Please read what I wrote again.

As far as the other bold statement....."the revealing of leg and thigh" I would take as meaning actually seeing the skin of the leg and thigh, not the form of the leg in pants. You are more likely to see skin in a dress than you will in pants.

You are certainly free to take that meaning from it, since it is demonstrating a principle, not offering a commandment.

However, a man is visually stimulated by the shape and form of a woman's leg and thigh, not just the sight of bare skin in that region. Tight jeans are designed to reveal just that: a woman's shape and form. The skin is covered, but the flesh is revealed to a man's eye.

Godly people are willing to make an effort to not be or not make occasion for their brother to stumble.

It is a principle, not a legality.

I know that the vast majority of women who pulled on a pair of pants this morning weren't doing so with plans of seduction or enticement. But they also did so in ignorance of why these garments even exist for them.