Spain will be counting American votes in 2012

[AreYouReady?]

Originally Posted by Cindy

How is this even legal?

That is what I want to know. I would like to know why all the media isn't talking about this? After having to think about this some more, I have just...more questions.

Apparently, according to the article: "When the Spanish online voting company SCYTL bought the largest vote processing corporation in the United States, it also acquired the means of manufacturing the outcome of the 2012 election. For SOE, the Tampa based corporation purchased by SCYTL in January, supplies the election software which records, counts, and reports the votes of Americans in 26 states–900 total jurisdictions–across the nation. ..." Find the rest of the article @ http://www.westernjournalism.com/spa...ny-will-count-...

the company that tallies our votes from electronic means...via internet and black box voting, has been bought by this company from Barcelona, Spain and they acquired the rights to count our votes.

I am also not sure why Ron Paul wrote in the Daily Paul:

1.) The Obama Government has outsourced the counting of votes for the 2012 election. But since WHEN does the nation need to outsource a task as uncomplicated and straightforward as vote-counting?


Not sure why Congress is allowing this to happen. Although I wish for a different president to be elected this year (disappointed that it looks like Romney may get the republican candidacy), I also think that Obama gets blamed for things he may have no part of.

Take for instance the Daily Paul writes:
2.) Obama outsorced the counting to a Tampa Florida company, named SOE, that had previously been used to administer the vote counting process for over 500 American jurisdictions.

My question would be if it had been previously used to administer the vote counting process, why would he be making a big deal saying Obama is outsourcing the vote counts?

The news media seems kind of crazy to me....talking about some things and not others.

And...I would have to question why Ron Paul would not take this up in Congress and just quote another article on a website that bears his name.

Something here just isn't adding up.