Quote:
Originally Posted by sandie
Deacon, you should have your own political blog, radio show...you have a way with words!
I could've highlighted many parts of our post. However I chose the last part because my husband, who is a pro-life democrat who has to swallow hard to vote republican and never, ever speaks to these kind of issues; said to me the other night, "wonder why Obama doesn't just show his birth certificate and if he can't show it, he should be out of office"! I liked to have fainted!
IF my husband is wondering about this, well then....that got me to thinking and doing some research and I'm coming to the same conclusions...hmmmm, just exactly why can't this thing be produced????
And why did McCain have to produce his BC? Seems I remember the media making a fuss about him being born in Panama, yet the very idea that Obama would have to stoop so low as to have to actually produce a BC makes the liberal elite and media laugh (and squirm at the same time).
|
sandie, here are some things to think about
:
1.
The lack of a long form BC does not prove he is not a natural born citizen (and the Constitution only requires that he be a natural born citizen, not that he has a long form BC).
2.
The lack of a long form BC does not make him unable to prove he is a natural born citizen. (Other things like his COLB which says it was filed 4 days after he was born and newspaper ads are EVIDENCE that he was born here).
3.
Even having a long form BC does not absolutely prove a person was born here. (There are ways it could have been faked or a doctor paid to produce a false one. I made this point to counter any argument that the evidence he has isn't enough proof that he was born here because it's not absolute).
Threaded Mode
