Oneness Pentecostal Apologetics Conference

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by TheLegalist

yawn.... typical Trinitarian response. Does the HS love the Father and the Son?

Well if God is love, what was the object of His love before creation?

[TheLegalist]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

Well if God is love, what was the object of His love before creation?

so no answer? thanks!

[mizpeh]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

That is what LadyRev was speaking about on her thread, "Negative thread after negative thread".

Someone then claimed it was a "crying wolf" tactic. Apparently, it is not.

And I'm with you, I'm taking a little vacation until someone can straighten out the rules of engagement. I'm a little tired of it, myself.

That doesn't make me dislike any poster. I just don't like the posting styles of some.

Hasta luego!!!

I thought the rules were that those who disagreed with the basic OP doctrine could come on here, be respectful, learn what we believe and why. It seems more and more they come on here to bash and call us heretics and a cult! I can take it and I expect it from the Trinnies at CARM but not here.

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by TheLegalist

so no answer? thanks!

I didn't expect you would have one.

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by mizpeh

I thought the rules were that those who disagreed with the basic OP doctrine could come on here, be respectful, learn what we believe and why. It seems more and more they come on here to bash and call us heretics and a cult! I can take it and I expect it from the Trinnies at CARM but not here.

Wow an unchallengeable view.

maybe that's why you keep hearing the word "Cult".

[mizpeh]

Originally Posted by notofworks

Thanks PO. I'm not POed!!

I just wanna make one thing clear, though....I didn't set out and launch an attack on Rev. Anderson. I've never heard of him before this thread. I didn't talk behind his back, I talked to him person to person, post to post.

And I didn't not launch an attack on him. I responded to what he FIRST posted, when he stated that there is a concerted effort to publish a Oneness Bible. To be honest, I can't believe a bunch of you Oneness bible-thumpers didn't jump on here and yell even louder than Baron and I did. Seriously, that's scary stuff.


And I'm not "hatin' on DB." I don't agree with the way he handles verses that appear to contradict the Oneness doctrine and I think it is an acceptable thing to say on an open forum."

Enjoy your time off!

Why not publish a Oneness Bible? There are so many types of study bibles for all types of believers. I get tired of reading study Bibles from Trinitarian commentators that treat the Trinity as though it was the truth.

[TheLegalist]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

I didn't expect you would have one.

I asked a question and you asked a question instead of answering what I asked.

your question is hypothetical and assumes to many things on to many different levels. My question is directly relevant.

1) you assume God has to love something in a certain way which is so hypothetical...
2) you assume love has to always have a object of affection. His nature and the results of his nature are two different things.

[mizpeh]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

Wow an unchallengeable view.

maybe that's why you keep hearing the word "Cult".

Who said "unchallengable"? They (OP views) should be discussed respectfully without being rude, crass, and insulting like the way you've treated DB on this thread.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by mizpeh

I thought the rules were that those who disagreed with the basic OP doctrine could come on here, be respectful, learn what we believe and why. It seems more and more they come on here to bash and call us heretics and a cult! I can take it and I expect it from the Trinnies at CARM but not here.

I'm still sitting here listening to some video clips and so I want to respond to this as you are addressing me.

That is exactly right! I didn't come to expect it here, but it's been growing and growing. I think that there are more people who have left the UPC posting here than ever before and it has naturally turned into this type of atmosphere. No disrespect to Lois Gibson, but the Spiritual Abuse forum was not my cup of tea. Now, AFF is becoming Part II, IMO.

I wanted it to remain a place that is an "open forum" to discuss everything, but now it's turned into a bash fest! I'm just not happy with it right now and am taking a break.

Okay, last post! Take care, Mizeph! I'd say "hold the fort", but I'm not sure the walls are tenable. LOL! God bless!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

Wow an unchallengeable view.

maybe that's why you keep hearing the word "Cult".

Baron,
You're a smart man. You know that we can challenge views without acting like jerks about it. Just sayin'.....