"But I digress .....I have to question the legitimacy of any WPF General Council member who is not a member of the WPF to participate in the functions described in their bylaws ...
Their vote would, I believe, be void.
This position as described is more than just an advisory position." -DAII
I don't really think the GC has done anything... It is such a new group that I think they created more organization than they even use at this point. I am quite sure Bro. Craft is not doing much advising since I have attended all the recent large meetings plus more... and have not seen him at ANY of them....
And yes, even though it makes your 'concerns' about his dual-involvement a bit dramatic (and obvious of your never-ending agenda by bringing it up), I think the general council was a name dropping exercise initially while they were seeking legitimacy- and really has had no role so far... I would have to be unconscious to deny that they have not made mistakes in their start up process. I have no desire to hash that out on this forum.. Some of you keep boredom at bay by doing that- I, myself enjoy a good book, walks around the lake, and twitter
.
As far as the other, Bro. Craft is a wonderful man up in age.. It seems just mean to pick on him.... Oh well, 'tis what it is; he probably could care less anyway...
I really did not intend for my few posts to be for the purpose of the Faithful Critics and Illustrious Leaders of Sarcasm to pick all apart.... I do realize though that I was asking for it when I jumped in on one of your threads.
I have never been of the crowd that thinks organization or leadership is not open for scrutiny. But with the very sad fact that I get my feelings hurt- (I said it was very sad!), my minority-WPF-self (albeit, I am a girl- with NO card) will stay clear from this point from inviting argument... I have no desire to further become the spokesperson for all their bylaws, agendas, etc....
Once again, I just liked Bro. Craft....
Linear Mode
