The Hypocrisy of the Brown 2012 bandwagon

DAII · #1 01-20-2010, 08:44 AM

I marvel to see the pseudo-conservative posters on this forum who have now jumped on the imaginary Brown for President 2012 bandwagon.

I wonder if there will be righteous indignation if this indeed does happen ...

When Dems question and belittle the experience of a politician with limited experience as a state legislator and with much less experience as a federal legislator if he makes a run in 2012.

Where will the "community organizer" cat calls be?

More hypocritical ... are the Christian right activists here that are willing to abandon their moral holy grails ... and support a candidate that supports legalized abortion and admittedly holds the same views on anti-gay marriage and pro civil-unions as Obama.

Looks like a pact "with the devil" is in the making ... as party zeal blinds the lockstep hate-talk show sycophants who have sought to spiritualize politics on this forum.

Surely some will compromise principle in the their hatred ....

Neck · #2 01-20-2010, 09:18 AM

If Brown did not win the election then we would have more piled on us. If Bill Clinton could change his pro-life... life-long stance as Gov of Arkansas to pro-choice. Then Scott Brown could change his stance on pro-choice to pro-life to fit his parties agenda. You can't call the celebrating republicans hypocritical until you look the AFF camera in the face and say, Bill Clinton is also hypocritical!

n david · #3 01-20-2010, 09:36 AM

It's true, Brown has as much experience as Obama did before running for President. In fact, Brown would almost mirror BHO's US Senate experience if he ran in 2012. I believe Brown was in state politics as a Rep and State Senator longer than BHO though.

I also find it amusing that so many conservatives rallied behind a former nude Cosmo mag model, pro-choice and civil union politician ... but politics makes strange bedfellows they say.

I'm glad Brown won. Obama and Democrats need to slow down in their pursuit to wreck the country.

Right now it's wayyyy too soon to talk about Brown for President, but I wouldn't care if he was on the ticket as VP in 2012.

DAII · #4 01-20-2010, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

It's true, Brown has as much experience as Obama did before running for President. In fact, Brown would almost mirror BHO's US Senate experience if he ran in 2012. I believe Brown was in state politics as a Rep and State Senator longer than BHO though.

I also find it amusing that so many conservatives rallied behind a former nude Cosmo mag model, pro-choice and civil union politician ... but politics makes strange bedfellows they say.

I'm glad Brown won. Obama and Democrats need to slow down in their pursuit to wreck the country.

Right now it's wayyyy too soon to talk about Brown for President, but I wouldn't care if he was on the ticket as VP in 2012.

Thanx for being consistent.

DAII · #5 01-20-2010, 09:45 AM

N David can you clarify your "thumbs up" to Hoovie's suggestion to a Brown-Jindal ticket here:

http://apostolicfriendsforum.com/sho...09&postcount=6

crakjak · #6 01-20-2010, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII

I marvel to see the pseudo-conservative posters on this forum who have now jumped on the imaginary Brown for President 2012 bandwagon.

I wonder if there will be righteous indignation if this indeed does happen ...

When Dems question and belittle the experience of a politician with limited experience as a state legislator and with much less experience as a federal legislator if he makes a run in 2012.

Where will the "community organizer" cat calls be?

More hypocritical ... are the Christian right activists here that are willing to abandon their moral holy grails ... and support a candidate that supports legalized abortion and admittedly holds the same views on anti-gay marriage and pro civil-unions as Obama.

Looks like a pact "with the devil" is in the making ... as party zeal blinds the lockstep hate-talk show sycophants who have sought to spiritualize politics on this forum.

Surely some will compromise principle in the their hatred ....

We will have to observe how Scott Brown serves in the Senate, and compare that to Obama's. Yep, we'll see how that goes, Obama had nothing to show for his two years of "not being" in the Senate. Except maybe for meeting with far leftist to see how he could use Chicago politics to steal the presidency.
ie:Acorn etc.

Aquila · #7 01-20-2010, 10:15 AM

Let's face it, the Republican Party is the party of business and free enterprise... and religion is a business.

Apocrypha · #8 01-20-2010, 10:24 AM

Romney / Jindall 2012 would crush Obama.

Light · #9 01-20-2010, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak

We will have to observe how Scott Brown serves in the Senate, and compare that to Obama's. Yep, we'll see how that goes, Obama had nothing to show for his two years of "not being" in the Senate. Except maybe for meeting with far leftist to see how he could use Chicago politics to steal the presidency.
ie:Acorn etc.

So if he does the things that conservatories want his lower than low morals don't matter to you. All the abortion talk was just that TALK. Being nude in a national mag. is all right now. Why my goodness how things change.

n david · #10 01-20-2010, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII

N David can you clarify your "thumbs up" to Hoovie's suggestion to a Brown-Jindal ticket here:

http://apostolicfriendsforum.com/sho...09&postcount=6

Clarification, the ticket is actually Jindal-Brown.

From what I've read of Jindal, I like him and wouldn't mind seeing him run for President. And based on my comments above, I wouldn't mind Brown on a ticket in 2012 as VP.

Brown won the Indie votes and even took some Democrat votes ... the next Republican candidate needs someone on the ticket to get those votes in order to win.