I'll second that motion. That would go over like a lead balloon with Muslim men to have their women scanned.
It would go over like a lead balloon to have muslim men scanned as well..to single them out. Of course that is what the muslim extremists are counting on...then again that is what the globalists are counting on.
In some nations you have to have a national ID card and you have to have your religion on it...you think that's coming to America in the name of security?
__________________ Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
Every sinner must repent of their sins.
That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
I'm for it. When was the last time some big, blond-haired guy of Swedish heritage with a name like Arnie Svenson from Minnesota tried to sneak a bomb on a plane or blow up a building?
__________________
Last edited by John Atkinson; 12-30-2009 at 06:38 AM.
Location: just north of the celtics red sox and patriots go baby!
Posts: 730
Re: Full Body Scanning at Airports
the latest machines dont even have a humnan watching, its watched by a computer software program . from what i have seen you could take any scan of any woman with the so called perfect figure and say its anyone you want for a celebrity, well except rosie etc., there is no way to prove or disprove it, its not that detailed folks, its just an outline not a picture .
We are being reactive instead of proactive in every situation where this simple group of people are outwitting the nation with the highest technology....rocking a mighty nation by sewing plastic explosives in your underwear? That's ridiculous! The screening process in place should have detected this guy....it apparently wasn't followed. The body scanning should be used as a secondary screening process when someone meets the criteria and it's deemed necessary...this guy was a posterchild for that. Shouldn't be used on grandma flying to meet the family for a holiday visit...but would be used more than on terrorists because it's the politically correct thing to do : (
I'm for it. When was the last time some big, blond-haired guy of Swedish heritage with a name like Arnie Svenson from Minnesota tried to sneak a bomb on a plane or blow up a building?
the latest machines dont even have a humnan watching, its watched by a computer software program . from what i have seen you could take any scan of any woman with the so called perfect figure and say its anyone you want for a celebrity, well except rosie etc., there is no way to prove or disprove it, its not that detailed folks, its just an outline not a picture .
Wrong again old timer, it has a human being on the other end!
Im opposed as long as they have opposite sex personal doing the scanning. I think if they are gonna make it mandatory then they need to have one line for men and one for women
One time (maybe right after 9/11) my grandmother was going through airport security and went through a "pat down" check.
During the check, my grandmother said, "I'd prefer to have a female doing the check."
Linear Mode
