Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Sanctuary > Deep Waters
Facebook

Notices

Deep Waters 'Deep Calleth Unto Deep ' -The place to go for Ministry discussions. Please keep it civil. Remember to discuss the issues, not each other.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 10-22-2009, 07:43 PM
Baron1710's Avatar
Baron1710 Baron1710 is offline
Cross-examine it!


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orcutt, CA.
Posts: 6,736
Re: Isaiah 3 and jewelry...

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog View Post
I have one question. Am I the only one here that can make no sense out of how rdp interprets the bible?
I'm not convinced it qualifies as an interpretation, in order to interpret you must first comprehend what you read.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 10-22-2009, 07:44 PM
jfrog's Avatar
jfrog jfrog is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,001
Re: Isaiah 3 and jewelry...

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdp View Post
I'm not talking about the definitions of the words, though certainly applicable, but rather the actual Greek Manuscripts of the verse. This is why the more modern translations [taken from manuscripts far older than what the KJV had available to them] adopt the verse as I state above [see NKJV, RSV, NIV, NASB].

But, really, all of this is a departure from the original topic. Does God condemn personal ornamentation by His people in His Word? Yes [See Deut. 7:25, I Tim. 2:9, for ex.].
1 Peter 3:3 NKJV Do not let your adornment be merely outward—arranging the hair, wearing gold, or putting on fine apparel

1 Peter 3:3 NIV Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as braided hair and the wearing of gold jewelry and fine clothes.

1 Peter 3:3 RSV Let not yours be the outward adorning with braiding of hair, decoration of gold, and wearing of fine clothing,

1 Peter 3:3 NASB Your adornment must not be merely external --braiding the hair, and wearing gold jewelry, or putting on dresses;

Seems two of the 4 versions rdp cites totally agrees with us on those verses... interesting

Also, older manuscripts are not necessarily more accurate than the not as old ones, I read a great article on this a long time ago (I do not have it now), but age alone of a manuscript does not indicate corruption or lack of corruption

Last edited by jfrog; 10-22-2009 at 08:28 PM. Reason: added the quote and found another flaw in reasoning
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 10-23-2009, 10:25 AM
Erasmus Erasmus is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 13
Re: Isaiah 3 and jewelry...

I'm a little late to this thread - but I think at the heart of this discussion is "tradition." While many UPCI ministers claim they have rejected tradition, they are talking mostly about doctrinal issues, not righteousness issues. While the UPCI has only been around (officially) for about 60 years, they have developed their own traditions. When you are taught something your whole life, it is VERY difficult to give up on it -- especially when you were taught that giving up those things is sinful, or "moving the landmarks," or whatever terminology is used in sermons throughout the years.

Personally, I don't believe God is upset by jewelry, any more than He is upset by anything else a person wears -- as long as the person's spirit is right. Lasciviousness (wearing clothing to excite sexually) or pride (wearing something to show off wealth) are obviously sins -- but I don't see how God could get upset by someone wearing inexpensive jewelry modestly. At least, I can't find Scriptures to support this view.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 10-23-2009, 01:06 PM
RandyWayne RandyWayne is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 16,746
Re: Isaiah 3 and jewelry...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erasmus View Post
I'm a little late to this thread - but I think at the heart of this discussion is "tradition." While many UPCI ministers claim they have rejected tradition, they are talking mostly about doctrinal issues, not righteousness issues. While the UPCI has only been around (officially) for about 60 years, they have developed their own traditions. When you are taught something your whole life, it is VERY difficult to give up on it -- especially when you were taught that giving up those things is sinful, or "moving the landmarks," or whatever terminology is used in sermons throughout the years.

Personally, I don't believe God is upset by jewelry, any more than He is upset by anything else a person wears -- as long as the person's spirit is right. Lasciviousness (wearing clothing to excite sexually) or pride (wearing something to show off wealth) are obviously sins -- but I don't see how God could get upset by someone wearing inexpensive jewelry modestly. At least, I can't find Scriptures to support this view.
Or even expensive jewelry for that matter as long as it is worn with the right attitude.

Honestly, how someone can read the Word where jewelry is spoken about again and again in such glowing terms, then turn around and say "Well God is speaking about the JEWEL itself and doesn't actually want you to wear it....", even though He spoke about doing just that in a positive light. "THAT was just symbolic!"
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 10-23-2009, 01:12 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Jesus' Name Pentecostal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
Re: Agree, but............

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdp View Post
.....the verse in question is Ezek. 16, where God says that He covered Jerusalem w/ His "skirt." Should we then interpret this to mean that He literally "covered" the entire city in His "skirt"....& then put a "nose-ring" in the city of Jerusalem's nose?!?!?

Clearly, the passages employed by jewelry advocates are to be understood as figures of speech reflecting the beauty [as the jewels] of God's Mercy, & not in any way endorsing personal ornamentation.
Jesus wept and said, "O Jerusalem. Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee..." He was not implying that the houses, shops, streets, etc had physically done this but the people of the city. The same way I could say that Cincinnati is playing Chicago this Sunday in the Bengals stadium. The Carew Tower and the Ohio River and Main Street are not playing against the Sears Tower, Lake Michigan, and Maxwell Street but people are playing against people. YHWH was not talking in Ezekiel 16 about the buildings, streets and rocks but about the people. So we agree there.

However, YHWH said that He had decked out His child bride in nose rings, clothing, etc. Yes, there may have been spiritual meanings for each of those items, but if the nose rings and clothing were sinful or wrong He would not have used them in a pictorial way. He was actually saying that literal nose rings and clothing were acceptable adornment for His people and He was using them in a figurative way. He used adultlery/fornication/whoredom in a figurative way to depict their sin because adultery/fornication/whoredom are sinful literally also.

Last edited by Sam; 10-23-2009 at 01:13 PM. Reason: correct typo
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 10-23-2009, 01:25 PM
rdp rdp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667
The reason why..........

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog View Post
I have one question. Am I the only one here that can make no sense out of how rdp interprets the bible?
"The natural mind receiveth not the things of God." [I Cor.]. The carnal mind "is not subject to the things of God, neither indeed CAN be." {Rom. 8}.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 10-23-2009, 01:28 PM
rdp rdp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667
Yea, such as............

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710 View Post
I'm not convinced it qualifies as an interpretation, in order to interpret you must first comprehend what you read.
".....not the wearing of gold jewelry,...." [Amplified]. That's reeeeeeeeeal hard to "comprehend" eh?? LOL...........
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 10-23-2009, 01:32 PM
rdp rdp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667
Who taught you to count???

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog View Post
1 Peter 3:3 NKJV Do not let your adornment be merely outward—arranging the hair, wearing gold, or putting on fine apparel

1 Peter 3:3 NIV Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as braided hair and the wearing of gold jewelry and fine clothes.

1 Peter 3:3 RSV Let not yours be the outward adorning with braiding of hair, decoration of gold, and wearing of fine clothing,

1 Peter 3:3 NASB Your adornment must not be merely external --braiding the hair, and wearing gold jewelry, or putting on dresses;

Seems two of the 4 versions rdp cites totally agrees with us on those verses... interesting

Also, older manuscripts are not necessarily more accurate than the not as old ones, I read a great article on this a long time ago (I do not have it now), but age alone of a manuscript does not indicate corruption or lack of corruption
The NASB alone [that would be 1...not 2] agrees w/ your particular angle [to the violation of context]. Besides, I've repeatedly cited the Greek manuscript here....only to have it ignored [go figure].

The RSV & NKJV derive from the MT [Received Text], not the CT [Alexandrian Text], & they both translate the verse w/ "fine apparel". Try again!

Do you folks know what "not" means? Sheesh!
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 10-23-2009, 01:35 PM
rdp rdp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667
Re: Isaiah 3 and jewelry...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne View Post
Or even expensive jewelry for that matter as long as it is worn with the right attitude.

Honestly, how someone can read the Word where jewelry is spoken about again and again in such glowing terms, then turn around and say "Well God is speaking about the JEWEL itself and doesn't actually want you to wear it....", even though He spoke about doing just that in a positive light. "THAT was just symbolic!"
Also spoke about "covering" Jerusalem in His "skirt" positively. When is the last time you literally tried this???? Be consistent............
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 10-23-2009, 01:38 PM
jfrog's Avatar
jfrog jfrog is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,001
Re: The reason why..........

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdp View Post
"The natural mind receiveth not the things of God." [I Cor.]. The carnal mind "is not subject to the things of God, neither indeed CAN be." {Rom. 8}.
No wonder you have such a problem receiving the things we are telling you...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Isaiah 43:1-28 shawndell Fellowship Hall 5 01-30-2009 08:18 AM
Isaiah 5 AmericanAngel Fellowship Hall 5 11-21-2008 10:58 PM
Are Cellphones Jewelry? Nahum Fellowship Hall 41 12-06-2007 12:37 AM
For Jewelry Wearers Only!!! ILG Fellowship Hall 27 09-05-2007 09:42 AM
****Prohibition of Jewelry in the Bible**** Nahum Fellowship Hall 126 07-28-2007 05:16 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.