The Palin vs Biden Debate Your Thoughts - Page 33

Light · #**321** 10-04-2008, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY

Dear Bro. Light. Why are you so unhappy? I don't think you heard her at all. If you did you wasn't listening very closely. She said exactly what she should have said. Marriage must remain between male and female. Maybe you need to get under the spout where the glory comes out.

What make you so sure I am so unhappy? I see this woman for what she really is. I am so happy she is on the Republican ticket. She is the last straw in McCan't remembers backpack of blunders.

Maybe you need to keep your self righteous banter quite and just talk about the politics.

So unworthy She uses the words I agree that they have the same rights as married couples. Any way you cut it your are in denial. She said she wanted same sex couples to be able to have health insurance the same as your family.
She wants same sex couples to be able to visit, sign for medical procedures, to be able to have legal papers that state they are a same sex couples just the same as a married couple just no marriage liscens. That is marriage any way you slice it.

TRFrance · #**322** 10-04-2008, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Light

So unworthy She uses the words I agree that they have the same rights as married couples. Any way you cut it your are in denial. She said she wanted same sex couples to be able to have health insurance the same as your family.
She wants same sex couples to be able to visit, sign for medical procedures, to be able to have legal papers that state they are a same sex couples just the same as a married couple just no marriage liscens. That is marriage any way you slice it.

....and Obama/Biden believe the same thing. So don't you criticize them too?

Light · #**323** 10-04-2008, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRFrance

....and Obama/Biden believe the same thing. So don't you criticize them too?

Yes I do, I don't agree with every thing about them just as you probably don't with McCan't remember.
The RIGHT (maybe not all) are against gay couples, yet this very very RIGHT WING Pentecostal woman says she agrees with Obama / Biden on gay rights as long as it's not called marriage. As a Democrat I don't I believe they should have any rights at all as a couple. That's just my oppinion.

TRFrance · #**324** 10-04-2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Light

Yes I do, I don't agree with every thing about them just as you probably don't with McCan't remember.
The RIGHT (maybe not all) are against gay couples, yet this very very RIGHT WING Pentecostal woman says she agrees with Obama / Biden on gay rights as long as it's not called marriage. As a Democrat I don't I believe they should have any rights at all as a couple. That's just my oppinion.

.

Its funny how people want to refer to Palin as "very very RIGHT WING"... but you never hear those same people refer to Barack Obama as very very LEFT WING.... (which he IS!)

I wonder why that is (?)
-----------------

Closed-mindedness is a terrible thing.

Light · #**325** 10-04-2008, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRFrance

.

Its funny how people want to refer to Palin as "very very RIGHT WING"... but you never hear those same people refer to Obama as very very LEFT WING.... (which he IS!)

I wonder why that is (?)
-----------------

Closed-mindedness is a terrible thing.

Because Obama/Biden are not the very very left wing.
They are left but not the far left.

Yes close mindedness is a terrible thing. It's awful funny you only address the word right. How about Sara agreeing that queers should have the same rights as a married couple as long as you don't call it a marriage. I guess it's because you no longer have a leg to stand on, on queer rights.

SOUNWORTHY · #**326** 10-04-2008, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Light

Because Obama/Biden are not the very very left wing.
They are left but not the far left.

Yes close mindedness is a terrible thing. It's awful funny you only address the word right. How about Sara agreeing that queers should have the same rights as a married couple as long as you don't call it a marriage. I guess it's because you no longer have a leg to stand on, on queer rights.

StillStanding · #**327** 10-04-2008, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRFrance

.

Its funny how people want to refer to Palin as "very very RIGHT WING"... but you never hear those same people refer to Barack Obama as very very LEFT WING.... (which he IS!)

I wonder why that is (?)
-----------------

Closed-mindedness is a terrible thing.

True. Palin is an extremist, but somehow Obama isn't.

Light, what I got from the debate is that both Biden and Palin were in agreement as far as equal rights for gay couples. I also believe they should have the same benefits and tax breaks as a married couples.

I believe, just like them, that the marriage covenant should remain between a man and a woman. If gays want to enter into some kind of legal union in order to have the same benefits as a married couple, let them have at it. Just don't call it a marriage.

Light · #**328** 10-04-2008, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Steinway

True. Palin is an extremist, but somehow Obama isn't.

Light, what I got from the debate is that both Biden and Palin were in agreement as far as equal rights for gay couples. I also believe they should have the same benefits and tax breaks as a married couples.

I believe, just like them, that the marriage covenant should remain between a man and a woman. If gays want to enter into some kind of legal union in order to have the same benefits as a married couple, let them have at it. Just don't call it a marriage.

What difference does it make what it's called? If they have every thing that a marriage has it is a marriage. If two company's merge in the business world it's called a marriage.

If it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, It's a DUCK.

A illegal couple and their two children came to church and the Lord filled all of them with the Holy Ghost.
In fact the woman who spoke no English spoke in perfect English as she received the HG. It turned out that this couple were not married yet have two children together.
They were not able to get a liscens to be married because of their circumstances. I called them before the church an married them without a liscens. Do you think they are not a married couple because they have no state liscens?

SOUNWORTHY · #**329** 10-04-2008, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Light

What difference does it make what it's called? If they have every thing that a marriage has it is a marriage. If two company's merge in the business world it's called a marriage.

Go ahead and compare those oranges and apples.

If it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, It's a DUCK.

A illegal couple and their two children came to church and the Lord filled all of them with the Holy Ghost.
In fact the woman who spoke no English spoke in perfect English as she received the HG. It turned out that this couple were not married yet have two children together.
They were not able to get a liscens to be married because of their circumstances. I called them before the church an married them without a liscens. Do you think they are not a married couple because they have no state liscens?

No, they are not married according to state laws unless they have lived together long enough for it to becommon law or that would be true of other states Texas may be different. As it is they have no legal rights. I have discussed this same issue in the past. I believe they are still living in sin and you are justifying it. Even though marriage is is sacred before God it is also a legal process. Why were they not able to get a license? All they need is a birth certificate and money.

Now I know where to go when I want to live with some gal without getting married an still be OK in the sight of the church or your church anyhow!!

Light · #**330** 10-04-2008, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY

No, they are not married according to state laws unless they have lived together long enough for it to becommon law or that would be true of other states Texas may be different. As it is they have no legal rights. I have discussed this same issue in the past. I believe they are still living in sin and you are justifying it. Even though marriage is is sacred before God it is also a legal process. Why were they not able to get a license? All they need is a birth certificate and money.

Now I know where to go when I want to live with some gal without getting married an still be OK in the sight of the church or your church anyhow!!

I normally wouldn't answer a post as stupid as this, but here goes. They are in the country illegally. They can not get a license.In the eyes of God they are married.That's where it counts, who cares if it is sanctioned by the state. All of our forefathers did not have marriage liscens yet the were considered married .

A little common sense would go a long way but I guess that's asking to much from some.