Can you tell the difference between men's pants &

[LUKE2447]

Originally Posted by Berkeley

Number 2 and 3 of the men's are too tight.

None of the womens jeans are appropriate. Too much shape on her badonkadonk.

I would agree in part though I draw the line at gauchos that are very loose and not fitting and look like dresses. I see that as a modest medium of CLEAR distinction.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by LUKE2447

only in the sense it is formly shaped and tight to the crotch and thighs on women and not loose like it should be. Thus her figure is making the distinction not the clothes.

I will agree some pants do look different but to me this is more of a issue of rebellion of the feministic mind set of the culture. We see this all throughout our society now. Alot of clothes I see worn today would have always been considered wrong to wear throughout church history.

No, the are made differently too!

It's not just the look at all.

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

Who has the issue here????

God gave this man a set of eyes...

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

No, the are made differently too!

It's not just the look at all.

You're right.

[LUKE2447]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

No, the are made differently too!

It's not just the look at all.

see that is the problem you base MADE differently as acctable not matter how slight it would be. What is made different the zipper is on the opposite side? That is not clear distinction. The cut on most jeans for women are not appropriate and do not follow anything in the sense Paul used the term apparel. katastolē

[soldoutochrist]

Originally Posted by 1Corinth2v4

So much for modesty!

You must note, I didn't say that I approved of what they were wearing. I'm just stating that that's what you see walking down the street, and there is a big difference.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by LUKE2447

see that is the problem you base MADE differently as acctable not matter how slight it would be. What is made different the zipper is on the opposite side? That is not clear distinction. The cut on most jeans for women are not appropriate and do not follow anything in the sense Paul used the term apparel. katastolē

The cut in the straddle is shorter for a woman than a man's.

I'm not arguing to wear/not wear pants just the facts.

Have you tried to put on a pair of ladies pants? I think it MIGHT cramp your style a bit (even wearing the correct size).

[LUKE2447]

Originally Posted by soldoutochrist

You must note, I didn't say that I approved of what they were wearing. I'm just stating that that's what you see walking down the street, and there is a big difference.

yeah provactive for the most part.

[LUKE2447]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

The cut in the straddle is shorter for a woman than a man's.

I'm not arguing to wear/not wear pants just the facts.

Have you tried to put on a pair of ladies pants? I think it MIGHT cramp your style a bit (even wearing the correct size).

I understand but that is still not clear distinction. That is forming!

[ThePastorsCoach]

Yes, the men have the mens jeans on and the women have the womens jeans on.
Most women have breast and most men don't.
Most women look feminine and most men don't.
99% of the time - I can tell which is a man or a woman no matter what they are wearing.
Hmmmmmm Isn't that something!
How much time did Jesus and the Apostles spend on this?