A Petition Movement to Save the Union

[StillStanding]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Difference being ... he's an equal opportunity "hater"

hahaha! I was going to answer the previous post and saw you already answered it. The difference is that I did not identify who the wolfes were. My "wolf" refers to ANYONE whether lib or con who is assertively trying to divide the organization. Shamgar1, did my words hit close to home?

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

The following domain is available, PianoMan ....

www.unityaboveall.com

When I clicked on that, I got the following message:
-------------------------
Server not found

Firefox can't find the server at www.unityaboveall.com.

Check the address for typing errors such as
ww.example.com instead of
www.example.com

If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network
connection.

If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.

----------------------------

[StillStanding]

Originally Posted by Sam

When I clicked on that, I got the following message:
-------------------------
Server not found

Firefox can't find the server at www.unityaboveall.com.

Check the address for typing errors such as
ww.example.com instead of
www.example.com

If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network
connection.

If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.

----------------------------

This all means that that address is available for purchase, if someone would like to use it!

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by Pianoman

I'm not UPCI anymore, but I do care about it's future! Actually, believe it or not, I've been praying for the organization.

I still respect your opinion higher than others here.

Originally Posted by Pianoman

After reading CW's article, I'm calling on some brave leaders to come forward and spearhead a petition to be signed by as many licensed preachers as possible, to pledge to not leave the UPCI over the TV vote.

Maybe this would help identify the wolves on each side of the debate that are seeking to cause division. What better way to save the fellowship than to take away the wolve's ammunition of consenses.

Who said they are leaving? this is a misconception. Some of them are determined to stay until forced out so they can make a change!

Shall we also start a pledge asking everyone to LEAVE if it does NOT pass.

I did not like the wording of Resolution #6 myself.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind

I still respect your opinion higher than others here.



Who said they are leaving? this is a misconception. Some of them are determined to stay until forced out so they can make a change!

Shall we also start a pledge asking everyone to LEAVE if it does NOT pass.

I did not like the wording of Resolution #6 myself.

BOOM ... I've heard this argument before about NOT LIKING THE WORDING from several others ... can you tell why? Second, wouldn't most anti-tv proponents say the same thing ... I don't like the wording?

[SDG]

Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind

I still respect your opinion higher than others here.



Who said they are leaving? this is a misconception. Some of them are determined to stay until forced out so they can make a change!

Shall we also start a pledge asking everyone to LEAVE if it does NOT pass.

I did not like the wording of Resolution #6 myself.

How would passage of resolution 6 force anyone not to hang on to their principles? I don't get it? Even if it passes .... a person could still keep their convictions and not participate in TV advertising . .. ANY other thought seems to illogical to me .

The petition Pianoman speaks of is one that seeks unity ... what could be wrong with it ... it does not make a foregone conclusion of what the vote will be ... but asks all men of God to accept the will of the ministry and move on.

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

BOOM ... I've heard this argument before about NOT LIKING THE WORDING from several others ... can you tell why? Second, wouldn't most anti-tv proponents say the same thing ... I don't like the wording?

Well I knew I could not go to Columbus, so I discarded mine and there are not any available DVD archives to show what it actually said, but I simply did not like the way it was versed.

Again, I cannot remember the wording, but I did not like it at all even after reading it five or six times through.

I don't know why the issue of anti-TV means anything about the ramifications of a resolution. We can vote a man in or out, a change in bylaws lives forever. They are worth wording correctly.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind

Well I knew I could not go to Columbus, so I discarded mine and there are not any available DVD archives to show what it actually said, but I simply did not like the way it was versed.

Again, I cannot remember the wording, but I did not like it at all even after reading it five or six times through.

I don't know why the issue of anti-TV means anything about the ramifications of a resolution. We can vote a man in or out, a change in bylaws lives forever. They are worth wording correctly.

Here is the wording:



What part of it are you uncomfortable with? Who says it carries on forever ... no one is changing the resolution process .... it can be amended and/ or changed.

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

The petition Pianoman speaks of is one that seeks unity ... what could be wrong with it ... it does not make a foregone conclusion of what the vote will be ... but asks all men of God to accept the will of the ministry and move on.

It has shown to be true here that being left alone and moving on is not gonna happen.

If that were the case some would have not posted such hatred against what they left behind.

I am one who thinks they are dragging their feet on the issue in committee also. It does not take THIS long to get something in wording to the preachers. They can get the requests for $$ printed, get on the ball and move this along. I was disappointed we did not see something in writing when they did table this with a defined timeframe of when they were expecting to answer this.

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

What part of it are you uncomfortable with? Who says it carries on forever ... no one is changing the resolution process .... it can be amended and/ or changed.

Have you heard of them revoking the AS that so many have spoken against?

Not gonna happen either.