Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:20 AM
bkstokes's Avatar
bkstokes bkstokes is offline
Jesus is the Christ


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

My philosophy is if people want to live that why fine, but don't make into a test of spirituality. MANY believe that the stricter one is with type of stuff, then the holier you are. It is written that His blood is what sanctifies, not standards.

Apart from this,

Mark I think it is time that this issue go away. I disdain the fact that this would be oneness pentecostals calling card. A man I know, sincerely saw little difference between pentecostals and the FLDS (talking about dress). I didn't even try to go into the differences because really it is the same mentality (unscriptural subjection of women). One can really make the Bible say pretty much near anything (twisting and turning it) -- Look at the crazy posts that have been going on in the forum of late.
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24

Mone me, amabo te, si erro

No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:24 AM
StillStanding's Avatar
StillStanding StillStanding is offline
Beautiful are the feet......


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes View Post
My philosophy is if people want to live that why fine, but don't make into a test of spirituality. MANY believe that the stricter one is with type of stuff, then the holier you are. It is written that His blood is what sanctifies, not standards.

Apart from this,

Mark I think it is time that this issue go away. I disdain the fact that this would be oneness pentecostals calling card. A man I know, sincerely saw little difference between pentecostals and the FLDS (talking about dress). I didn't even try to go into the differences because really it is the same mentality (unscriptural subjection of women). One can really make the Bible say pretty much near anything (twisting and turning it) -- Look at the crazy posts that have been going on in the forum of late.
Good post!
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:29 AM
bkstokes's Avatar
bkstokes bkstokes is offline
Jesus is the Christ


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by cneasttx View Post
I decided I don't want to take the chance to be considered an abomination to the Lord.
I appreciate you sincere desire to be pleasing to the Lord. Nevertheless, we must ask the question -- what was the difference in dress in those days. If you go to your local Christian book store you may easily find many books on Biblical customs. The difference between the way a man dressed and the way a woman dressed was primarily ornamental. Both men and wome wore robe like attire. The difference consisted of the material used in the belts and the woman's robe had a fancier hem (sp?) to the robe. Don't believe me go check it out.

Here is a link that has some interesting points about seperate dress.

http://209.239.56.130/theopenheart/a...womenpants.htm
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24

Mone me, amabo te, si erro

No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:34 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes View Post
I appreciate you sincere desire to be pleasing to the Lord. Nevertheless, we must ask the question -- what was the difference in dress in those days. If you go to your local Christian book store you may easily find many books on Biblical customs. The difference between the way a man dressed and the way a woman dressed was primarily ornamental. Both men and wome wore robe like attire. The difference consisted of the material used in the belts and the woman's robe had a fancier hem (sp?) to the robe. Don't believe me go check it out.

Here is a link that has some interesting points about seperate dress.

http://209.239.56.130/theopenheart/a...womenpants.htm
My response had nothing to do with what I wear or don't wear but that my spirit be right with God, should have clarified I guess. If it doesn't come from the heart it doesn't matter.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:34 AM
StillStanding's Avatar
StillStanding StillStanding is offline
Beautiful are the feet......


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

For the record, I find it perfectly acceptable if a women chooses to wear only dresses. I admire their personal conviction and sacrifice.

The problem arises when they judge others by their own personal convictions. They separate themselves from other women of like faith that may not have the same convictions.
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:35 AM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes View Post
I appreciate you sincere desire to be pleasing to the Lord. Nevertheless, we must ask the question -- what was the difference in dress in those days. If you go to your local Christian book store you may easily find many books on Biblical customs. The difference between the way a man dressed and the way a woman dressed was primarily ornamental. Both men and wome wore robe like attire. The difference consisted of the material used in the belts and the woman's robe had a fancier hem (sp?) to the robe. Don't believe me go check it out.

Here is a link that has some interesting points about seperate dress.

http://209.239.56.130/theopenheart/a...womenpants.htm
It's more than that. It's finding our place and following the convictions we feel that God has placed in our own individual lives.

We can't even look back at the OT for this.

The world is in chaos, the church world is in chaos.

We just need to find where God wants us. I will also say when a person finds that place, for them, and it happens to be the UPC, we need to leave them and their convictions alone.

It's one thing to debate here, as we often do, but if someone feels that is what they need in their life to stand before God, we need to leave that alone.

Not everyone can live the same way. Not every person will have the same convictions. Some are stronger by personal choice.

We need to respect each person's decision and consecration.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:36 AM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoman View Post
For the record, I find it perfectly acceptable if a women chooses to wear only dresses. I admire their personal conviction and sacrifice.

The problem arises when they judge others by their own personal convictions. They separate themselves from other women of like faith that may not have the same convictions.
Pianoman,
Well said. I totally agree with you here.
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:37 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkstokes View Post
My philosophy is if people want to live that why fine, but don't make into a test of spirituality. MANY believe that the stricter one is with type of stuff, then the holier you are. It is written that His blood is what sanctifies, not standards.

Apart from this,

Mark I think it is time that this issue go away. I disdain the fact that this would be oneness pentecostals calling card. A man I know, sincerely saw little difference between pentecostals and the FLDS (talking about dress). I didn't even try to go into the differences because really it is the same mentality (unscriptural subjection of women). One can really make the Bible say pretty much near anything (twisting and turning it) -- Look at the crazy posts that have been going on in the forum of late.
I don't think I have ever looked like the FLDS women.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:38 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
It's more than that. It's finding our place and following the convictions we feel that God has placed in our own individual lives.

We can't even look back at the OT for this.

The world is in chaos, the church world is in chaos.

We just need to find where God wants us. I will also say when a person finds that place, for them, and it happens to be the UPC, we need to leave them and their convictions alone.

It's one thing to debate here, as we often do, but if someone feels that is what they need in their life to stand before God, we need to leave that alone.

Not everyone can live the same way. Not every person will have the same convictions. Some are stronger by personal choice.

We need to respect each person's decision and consecration.

Amen!
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:40 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Revisiting the "PANTS" Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoman View Post
For the record, I find it perfectly acceptable if a women chooses to wear only dresses. I admire their personal conviction and sacrifice.

The problem arises when they judge others by their own personal convictions. They separate themselves from other women of like faith that may not have the same convictions.
Good post PM, I agree. And vice versa on the judging thing.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**** Are the NCO and AWCF "raiding" the UPCI or providing a "safety net"? **** SDG The D.A.'s Office 373 02-06-2012 01:01 AM
Has "Church" become a "Family Business"?? SecretWarrior Fellowship Hall 70 06-09-2008 08:41 AM
What Does "Joint" or "Fellow" Heirs with Christ? Praxeas Fellowship Hall 2 01-13-2008 02:12 AM
It seems the word "Seperation" varies as much as "Holiness" does??? revrandy Fellowship Hall 20 09-29-2007 12:39 PM
Seven kids get "it" or "Him" at youth camp Sherri Fellowship Hall 10 07-16-2007 01:57 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.