02-25-2008, 01:43 AM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Hollywood Content? Do you agree?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRFrance
The original post is inherently contradictory. First he/she says the problem is the content, not the medium. Then he/she goes on to tell us why one particular medium (TV) is bad.
If the problem is Hollywood content, not the medium, why preach against TV then?
There's a lot on TV that's not "Hollywood content". So if someone watches CNN, The History Channel, or Home & Garden TV, how is that wrong?
And a remote control serves the same purpose to a TV set as a mouse does to a computer.
PentecostIsAlive, your argument is seriously flawed to the point of almost being irrational. The same way you chose to come here to ApostolicFriendsForum.com rather than an immoral website, you can also choose to turn on Fox News instead of the Soap Opera Channel on your TV. Whats so hard about that ?
|
And there ya have it folks. It is complicated primarily because of our past Pentecostal v. TV stances, but not in light of today's technology.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
Linear Mode
