Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old 09-24-2007, 05:56 PM
Pragmatist Pragmatist is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West
Posts: 1,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified View Post
Girl, I can shave my legs with my eyes closed! LOL!!!! I understand, though...the flamingo stance is difficult to accomplish when you're big and pregnant!

Nevertheless, I never missed shaving. Especially the last month...I was afraid I would go into labor and not have time to shave before getting to the hospital... (food for thought)
By that time, I seriously couldn't have cared less. The doctors and nurses have seen a lot worse than unshaved legs.
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 09-24-2007, 06:08 PM
lovemyjesus
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Can we take a quick look at Deut. 22:5 again? As I read thru it, I see that it says that women are not to wear that which pertains to a man. It also says that NEITHER is a man to put on a women's garment. If I'm not mistaken, it's comparing: a woman wearing that which pertains to the man TO a man putting on a woman's garment. I think it's safe to say that it's a true comparison. (2:4=4:8) In the latter part of the verse, it reads: "for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God."

In Revelation 22:27 It reads, "And there shall in no wise enter into it (that great city - v.10) any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life."
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:15 PM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovemyjesus View Post
Can we take a quick look at Deut. 22:5 again? As I read thru it, I see that it says that women are not to wear that which pertains to a man. It also says that NEITHER is a man to put on a women's garment. If I'm not mistaken, it's comparing: a woman wearing that which pertains to the man TO a man putting on a woman's garment. I think it's safe to say that it's a true comparison. (2:4=4:8) In the latter part of the verse, it reads: "for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God."

In Revelation 22:27 It reads, "And there shall in no wise enter into it (that great city - v.10) any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life."
There isn't a person here who disagrees with your post. We all believe the Bible here.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:18 PM
MissBrattified's Avatar
MissBrattified MissBrattified is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovemyjesus View Post
Can we take a quick look at Deut. 22:5 again? As I read thru it, I see that it says that women are not to wear that which pertains to a man. It also says that NEITHER is a man to put on a women's garment. If I'm not mistaken, it's comparing: a woman wearing that which pertains to the man TO a man putting on a woman's garment. I think it's safe to say that it's a true comparison. (2:4=4:8) In the latter part of the verse, it reads: "for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God."

In Revelation 22:27 It reads, "And there shall in no wise enter into it (that great city - v.10) any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life."
lovemyjesus, Thank you for the scriptural dissertation. Can you please provide us with a current list, then, of what comprises "that which pertains to a woman", "that which pertains to a man", "men's garments", "women's garments", and the reasons why you would classify each item as such?

Thank you.

P.S. Just for the sake of general interest, you could throw in a few paragraphs about what would have been male vs. female garments "back then"....(when Deuteronomy was written/spoken)
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone


"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."

--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:27 PM
mjmac
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
If a man puts on a women's garment (cross dressing) to come across as a woman, or vice versa then abomination has taken place. There isn't a single list of gender specific garments. That is cultural. Otherwise missionaries would have to westernize all their converts.
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:27 PM
pelathais's Avatar
pelathais pelathais is offline
Accepts all friends requests


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovemyjesus View Post
Can we take a quick look at Deut. 22:5 again? As I read thru it, I see that it says that women are not to wear that which pertains to a man. It also says that NEITHER is a man to put on a women's garment. If I'm not mistaken, it's comparing: a woman wearing that which pertains to the man TO a man putting on a woman's garment. I think it's safe to say that it's a true comparison. (2:4=4:8) In the latter part of the verse, it reads: "for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God."

In Revelation 22:27 It reads, "And there shall in no wise enter into it (that great city - v.10) any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life."
I'm afraid my question would only cloud the very fine discussion that is already going on- but on the subject of Revelation 22:27 and "abominations," aren't those who eat shellfish also kept out of the city? Or does the following simply mean that shellfish won't be served in the city?

10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:33 PM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmac View Post
If a man puts on a women's garment (cross dressing) to come across as a woman, or vice versa then abomination has taken place. There isn't a single list of gender specific garments. That is cultural. Otherwise missionaries would have to westernize all their converts.
Or we'd have to 'easternize'!

I don't see anywhere in the Bible where it gave men permission to stop wearing robes and wear bifurcated garments, do you?


__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:36 PM
Scott Hutchinson's Avatar
Scott Hutchinson Scott Hutchinson is offline
Resident PeaceMaker


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson,AL.
Posts: 16,548
What was the difference between the skins that God made for Adam and Eve were they sewed up slightly different ?
__________________
People who are always looking for fault,can find it easily all they have to do,is look into their mirror.
There they can find plenty of fault.
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 09-24-2007, 10:14 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson View Post
What was the difference between the skins that God made for Adam and Eve were they sewed up slightly different ?
Eve's was a see-through with lace??
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 09-24-2007, 10:15 PM
MissBrattified's Avatar
MissBrattified MissBrattified is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover View Post
Eve's was a see-through with lace??
I'd like to know which animal God tore THAT skin off of!
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone


"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."

--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question regarding women wearing pants... Sheltiedad Fellowship Hall 121 08-19-2012 11:42 PM
Long jean skirts Margies3 Fellowship Hall 4 02-21-2009 12:04 PM
Atlanta Considers Banning Baggy Pants TK Burk Fellowship Hall 5 08-23-2007 09:15 PM
Anyone offended by pants on baby girls? Pragmatist Fellowship Hall 50 08-10-2007 08:09 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.