huh? Men have more visible pieces/parts below the waist? I don't know what pants you are wearing but mine cover everything and are not form fitting. But if you feel the need to hide yourself, feel free to wear a very baggy dress.
That's what you think. I don't know what your concept is of a robe or pants but robes can be just as immodest depending on the fit.
Additionally I don't see anyone making an argument that pants aren't modest for women (except for womens pants that are intended to be tight) but rather that it's a matter of the distinction in sexes.
We obviously live on different planets if you believe that women have more to cover up below the waist... I'm not sure what else to say here...
We obviously live on different planets if you believe that women have more to cover up below the waist... I'm not sure what else to say here...
Hmmm, or someone is smoking something they should not be if you think I said women have more to cover up below the waist....
What a weird argument....I can't believe you are arguing men should wear dresses because they have more things sticking out below the waist line. Well now I have seen everything, just about.
__________________ Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
Every sinner must repent of their sins.
That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Hmmm, or someone is smoking something they should not be if you think I said women have more to cover up below the waist....
What a weird argument....I can't believe you are arguing men should wear dresses because they have more things sticking out below the waist line. Well now I have seen everything, just about.
Quote:
huh? Men have more visible pieces/parts below the waist? I don't know what pants you are wearing but mine cover everything and are not form fitting. But if you feel the need to hide yourself, feel free to wear a very baggy dress.
See the bolded part of your post... in elementary school, you learn that the squiggly thing with the dot at the end of it implies a question... and then you go on to justify that because your pants cover everything then it is okay for men to wear pants... while my argument is that pants cover up just as much on women!
I am saying that if women should not wear pants then men should not wear them either... how hard is that to understand... or is it just easier to pretend not to understand and stay in the Pentecostal matrix.
There isn't a lot more I can say here... I am telling you that 2+2=4 and you are saying it's not...
See the bolded part of your post... in elementary school, you learn that the squiggly thing with the dot at the end of it implies a question... and then you go on to justify that because your pants cover everything then it is okay for men to wear pants... while my argument is that pants cover up just as much on women
I am saying that if women should not wear pants then men should not wear them either... how hard is that to understand... or is it just easier to pretend not to understand and stay in the Pentecostal matrix.
There isn't a lot more I can say here... I am telling you that 2+2=4 and you are saying it's not...
And my question is, are you really making that for an argument for why women should be allowed to wear pants?!?! Because Men have more stuff below the waist? Don't you see that your argument is NOT proving that women should be allowed to wear pants? In fact your argument is that pants are NOT modest on men so they should wear robes. Do you really believe that? And if so do you wear robes and not pants? If you don't really believe that then I have to ask why make an argument you don't believe?
Sorry but pants on a man do not make him less modest because he has more stuff sticking out (good grief, note I did not bring this argument up to begin with)...however TIGHT pants on a man might do that and I don't know of anyone that believes women should not wear pants thinks it's ok for men to wear tight pants or women to wear tight skirts.
__________________ Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
Every sinner must repent of their sins.
That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Maybe aliens do exist.....where women have 'more' than the men.....LOL!
Not in MY world!
__________________
Psa 19:14 Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer.
1Pe 5:6-7 Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time: Casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you.
Tit 3:2 To speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, shewing all meekness unto all men.
Psa 51:10 Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me.
Linear Mode
