Trump's Staff and Cabinet - Page 13

Originalist · #**121** 12-06-2016, 07:32 PM

You heard it here first....

One of the reasons Trump is not holding a petty grudge but is instead considering Romney for S.O.S. is because Mitt has a hard line on China. I have been thinking this for days and actually heard Rush mention this today. This post is not made to endorse or agree with Trump in considering Romney.

Esaias · #**122** 12-06-2016, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Originalist

You heard it here first....

One of the reasons Trump is not holding a petty grudge but is instead considering Romney for S.O.S. is because Mitt has a hard line on China. I have been thinking this for days and actually heard Rush mention this today. This post is not made to endorse or agree with Trump in considering Romney.

The problem is, about 75% of those who voted for him and supported him did so hoping he would "drain the swamp".

The buyer's remorse this time around is gonna be YUUUGE, and the results are gonna be historic...

Originalist · #**123** 12-07-2016, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

The problem is, about 75% of those who voted for him and supported him did so hoping he would "drain the swamp".

The buyer's remorse this time around is gonna be YUUUGE, and the results are gonna be historic...

Your point is valid. But is Romney swamp dweller foreign issues?

n david · #**124** 12-07-2016, 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

The problem is, about 75% of those who voted for him and supported him did so hoping he would "drain the swamp".

The buyer's remorse this time around is gonna be YUUUGE, and the results are gonna be historic...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Originalist

Your point is valid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

Watching the meltdown from Trumpsters would be hilarious.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Originalist

Your complete lack of political insight and analytical skill is amazing. While some will not agree with such an appointment, there will be no."meltdown".

Incredible. Same basic message, yet I'm called an idiot for my post, while the other is "valid."

smh. Hate clouds the mind and bitterness the soul.

Originalist · #**125** 12-07-2016, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

Incredible. Same basic message, yet I'm called an idiot for my post, while the other is "valid."

smh. Hate clouds the mind and bitterness the soul.

You obviously are describing yourself.

Originalist · #**126** 12-07-2016, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esaias

The problem is, about 75% of those who voted for him and supported him did so hoping he would "drain the swamp".

The buyer's remorse this time around is gonna be YUUUGE, and the results are gonna be historic...

While Romney is a Hamiltonian/Henry Clay type, he did take a stand on illegal immigration and China. Is that what Trump is considering? Can Romney be considered part of the swamp in Washington? Do we take a wait-and-see approach giving Trump the benefit of the doubt? Certainly we are going to disagree with one or more of Trump's picks. But I think we err in automatically assuming they constitute a sell-out of some sort.

n david · #**127** 12-07-2016, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Originalist

You obviously are describing yourself.

No, you. You hate me so much that this post is just one example where I posted the same basic message as another and you attacked me while praising the other. Your bitterness and hatred won't allow you to admit I could be correct in a post. You see a post and your automatic knee jerk reaction is to dismiss, mock and attack.

Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporters reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

Originalist · #**128** 12-07-2016, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

No, you. You hate me so much that this post is just one example where I posted the same basic message as another and you attacked me while praising the other. Your bitterness and hatred won't allow you to admit I could be correct in a post. You see a post and your automatic knee jerk reaction is to dismiss, mock and attack.

Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporters reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

n david · #**129** 12-07-2016, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Originalist

What's wrong, can't answer the question?

Quick, change the subject! Post a YouTube song!

I noticed it a while back, but this time it was completely obvious.

Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

I don't actually expect you to clearly read my posts and respond like a normal person. It's just funny to see your bias and hackery made so obvious.

Originalist · #**130** 12-07-2016, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

What's wrong, can't answer the question?

Quick, change the subject! Post a YouTube song!

I noticed it a while back, but this time it was completely obvious.

Why else bash me for my post about Trump supporter's reaction to a Romney pick, but call Esaias' same type of statement a "valid" "point?"

I don't actually expect you to clearly read my posts and respond like a normal person. It's just funny to see your bias and hackery made so obvious.

I observed long ago that you cannot resist making everything about you. Your accusations of "hate" remind me of the tactics of the left. You treat everyone with rudeness and arrogance and when people push back you act like a cry baby. Dude, this is politics. This is not personal. Snap out of it.