Thomas Weisser Article IBC Perspectives - Page 2

Scott Pitta · #11 11-23-2016, 04:34 PM

I see no quotes or any documentation at all. But it is interesting. Let's see the documentation. If he were in San Diego in 1920, where did he worship ? Did he fellowship with other Oneness churches ?

Scott Pitta · #12 11-23-2016, 05:04 PM

The Mexican Apostolic Assembly date their founding to 1906 Azusa. They do mention Joseph Stewart, but make no mention to prior to 1906.

But the report I just read gave 1893 as the date when Stewart heard the Oneness message, but no documentation or quotes are given.

Interesting.

Armapeet.Singh · #13 11-23-2016, 07:40 PM

Sorry dear Brothers, been busy. Back now.

For my person, I think it is an interesting article in that if true it predates the idea of a restored doctrine in the early 1900's.

I am researching some other resources haveing come on some older manuscripts into Mexico and other countries as well.

Also in Ireland there appears to be evidence in the early 1800's of a extensive teachings of Acts 2:38 as the new Birth message. I will try to copy and post these as I can.

returnman · #14 02-01-2017, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armapeet.Singh

Sorry dear Brothers, been busy. Back now.

For my person, I think it is an interesting article in that if true it predates the idea of a restored doctrine in the early 1900's.

I am researching some other resources haveing come on some older manuscripts into Mexico and other countries as well.

Also in Ireland there appears to be evidence in the early 1800's of a extensive teachings of Acts 2:38 as the new Birth message. I will try to copy and post these as I can.

Extensive? Really? Ask yourself if the single way to heaven was fulfillment of Acts 2:38 throughout the centuries then how is it but a thread of evidence in church history? That's a lot of doomed people until it was supposedly resurrected in the early 20th century. I can understand current Acts 2:38 historians wanting justification given the access we have among ourselves to question such a claim. They did a pretty good job revising the two viewpoints of the merger in its day however.