Trump 2016

[n david]

Ben Sasse: """Public Service Announcement:
Saying someone can't do a specific job because of his or her race is the literal definition of "racism."""

But of course, Trumpsters are out in force trying to justify his attack.

The Judge is an American. Period. Trump is just upset about the ruling. His comments are indeed racist and completely inappropriate of a candidate for POTUS.

[aegsm76]

Yeah, Trump is way off base on this one.
I do not know why anyone would think that some one who was a member of "La Raza Lawyers of San Diego", (whose home page used to include a link to the La Raza site); was involved in giving a law school schloarship to an illegal; and is a Hillary contributor; would be biased against Trump.
Just ridiculous.

[Esaias]

I know, right? Tin foil hat stuff, fer shur.

[n david]

Originally Posted by aegsm76

Yeah, Trump is way off base on this one.
I do not know why anyone would think that some one who was a member of "La Raza Lawyers of San Diego", (whose home page used to include a link to the La Raza site); was involved in giving a law school schloarship to an illegal; and is a Hillary contributor; would be biased against Trump.
Just ridiculous.

smh.

Never mind. Not in the mood to argue over the orange clown.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by n david

smh.

Never mind. Not in the mood to argue over the orange clown.

Only in the mood to attack.

hit and run tactic?

[n david]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Only in the mood to attack.

hit and run tactic?

Nope. There's no link between the Judge's lawyer organization and the National Council of LA Raza. None.

The scholarship to an illegal is well out of context. The Judge was on a panel, a committee of lawyers who awarded scholarships to students. One was a kid who came with his parents illegally. Trumpsters make it out as though the Judge personally awarded the kid the scholarship on his own.

Lastly, there are a couple major reasons Trump's lawyers have not tried to seek the Judge's recusal: 1) a Judge's race, ethnicity or sex is NEVER a basis for recusal; and 2) were Trump's lawyers to try it, they could be sanctioned for it.

The reason I don't want to argue is because the post was ignorant and filled with errors.

[n david]

Also, I haven't read anywhere this claim that the Judge is a Hillary contributor. Please post the source of the claim. The law office representing the plaintiffs has given to Hillary, not the Judge AFAIK.

[aegsm76]

Headline on Drudge, this morning

link

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-u-j...cil-of-laraza/

[n david]

Originally Posted by aegsm76

Headline on Drudge, this morning

link

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-u-j...cil-of-laraza/

Ooooh, headline on Drudge Report, which next to Brietbart is Trump propagation HQ.

Same old, tired, and false, claim. The Judge is not a member of the NCLZ. He's not. The organization of which he is a member included a major Hispanic organization on the website. Big deal.

Many websites include other organizations in links for the community.

But continue on in your quest to smear the man.

[n david]

Also, probably should include FoxNew contributor (and huge Trump supporter) Kimberly Guilfoyle of "The Five" to this fantastical witch hunt, since she, too, is a member of the La Raza lawyers group.