'Impeach Obama' March in DC

[The Mrs]

Capitol Steps, Washington D.C. on June 14, 2013 at 12:00 pm.

“This is not about partisan politics, conspiracy theories, racism, or anything else. This is about America. Many of Barack Hussein Obama's actions and policies are unconstitutional, detrimental, and illegal. We must hold Obama and his administration accountable for their crimes. We must impeach Obama for treason.”

Anybody planning on attending?

http://www.examiner.com/article/grou...bama-march-d-c

[RandyWayne]

He doesn't need to be impeached.



He needs to be banished to the Phantom Zone.



From left to right: Hillary, Janet, and Obama. (Holder is standing behind them, out of view.)

[Pressing-On]

I'm sure he would love to escalate things in this country to throw down Martial law.

[RandyWayne]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I'm sure he would love to escalate things in this country to throw down Martial law.

There is a reason that the DHS is/has become another unofficial branch of the military.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

There is a reason that the DHC is/has become another unofficial branch of the military.

Yes, and this article speaks the truth.

Obama’s Dangerous Contempt for the Rule of Law
By Ramesh Ponnuru May 27, 2013 5:00 PM

That evidence is right there in the public record, and what it shows is indifference and contempt.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...le-of-law.html

[RandyWayne]

Oops, I meant DHS -Department of Homeland Security.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

Oops, I meant DHS -Department of Homeland Security.

I knew what you meant and read it that way - DHS.

[Dedicated Mind]

more bill clinton overreach. what happened then? clinton reelected and dems sweep the midterms. sensible americans will respond if wackos try this. again, where is the evidence of PRESIDENTIAL wrongdoing?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind

more bill clinton overreach. what happened then? clinton reelected and dems sweep the midterms. sensible americans will respond if wackos try this. again, where is the evidence of PRESIDENTIAL wrongdoing?

It's a bit too early in the process to declare that the President is implicated or that he's not implicated.

Can you at least agree that, with regards to the IRS scandal, the fact that we've been told for weeks that it was just a couple rogue employees in only the Cincinnati office who did this, and suddenly we have evidence that proves there were actually 5 different offices involved....can you agree that puts the administration in a bad light.

I'm not saying the President...not yet. But members of his staff: Carney and Pfeiffer; along with others in the IRS like Lerner, Shulman, and George -- they've all been pushing this story which we find out now (like the Benghazi talking points) is an arrogant, baldfaced LIE.

I can't say the President is implicated directly in this. But there are way too many coincidences to rule it out. However, you cannot responsibly and intelligently say he's completely innocent.

We're still in the process of getting the information. And with due respect to Rep Issa, who took exception to Sen Graham's request for a special prosecutor, I appreciate his dogged work on Fast and Furious and thus far with the IRS scandal; however, a special prosecutor is needed here and should be appointed by Congress since the President lied and has shown he's uninterested in the truth of what happened with the IRS targeting.

[Light]

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind

more bill clinton overreach. what happened then? clinton reelected and dems sweep the midterms. sensible americans will respond if wackos try this. again, where is the evidence of PRESIDENTIAL wrongdoing?

Hey right wing nuts don't need evidence just innuendo. Throw stuff at the wall crowd just to see if something sticks.