Romney Ahead of Obama in Polls

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

Romney and Obama: 2 of the worst people we could possibly vote for. sheeeesh!!

Sign of the times.

This world is headed somewhere, but I'm not going there with them.

[canam]

the only poll you need to pay attention to http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...-w.va-primary/

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

No, of course, I wouldn't completely trust InTrade. It's just that their odds have been much more accurate.

And you are not correct with the percentage on the healthcare ruling. InTrade predicts US Supreme Court to rule individual mandate unconstitutional by 57.8%.

Maybe now, after its pretty obvious it's going to go that way. But according to the video you linked us to it said they were predicting a 10% chance of Obamacare's individual mandate being ruled unconstitutional. It must've been before the 2010 elections b/c they were predicting defeat for Harry.

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by canam

the only poll you need to pay attention to http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...-w.va-primary/

That's funny

[canam]

He is doing time for extortion were doing time under someone who is extorting us, how appropiate ! suppose he will get a pardon from obama his last week in office ?

[Dordrecht]

This country is at a turning point.
If Obama gets in this country will go around the curve towards total destruction.

You can trust communists, they say what they stand for and they tell you what they want.

The population is sleeping.
The church is sleeping.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Maybe now, after its pretty obvious it's going to go that way. But according to the video you linked us to it said they were predicting a 10% chance of Obamacare's individual mandate being ruled unconstitutional. It must've been before the 2010 elections b/c they were predicting defeat for Harry.

I believe the difference is that the betting process began and increased after it became apparent the Supreme Court was going to be involved. We weren't certain of that before 2010.

An no one said that InTrade was 100% accurate. He simply won on negative campaigning, same as Romney.

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I believe the difference is that the betting process began and increased after it became apparent the Supreme Court was going to be involved. We weren't certain of that before 2010.

An no one said that InTrade was 100% accurate. He simply won on negative campaigning, same as Romney.

Everybody engages in negative campaigning. No one in the GOP primaries stands innocent. You need to get over it.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Everybody engages in negative campaigning. No one in the GOP primaries stands innocent. You need to get over it.

I probably do need to get over it, but I am not likely to do that any time soon. Mark Levin called out Romney and Chris Christie for their lies against Newt. They really stooped low in this campaign. 1% turnout in NC last night. Not great for the Republican Party. Of course, that could change in the General.

I will, more than likely, only vote for Romney because of Obama's actions toward Netanyahu and because of Obama's favoritism toward the Muslims.

I talked with a friend who has connections in the military (being retired) and he commented that the fear mongering rumor about Obama stopping future elections is bogus and that the military would never allow that to happen. So, there is a whole lot of fear mongering that the sky is going to fall if Obama gets re-elected.

And the Tea Party showed that they will hold Romney's feet to the fire with their support of Murdoch by putting an end to Lugar's 35-year Senate career. At least people are doing the right thing, regardless of the two that are running, work on the Senate and House. We will need them if either one gets elected.