|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
05-19-2011, 01:54 PM
|
 |
Jesus' Name Pentecostal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
|
|
|
Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Today, President Obama gave a speech on Middle East Policy.
Among other things he stated that:
1. he wants two states --Israel and Palestine,
2. he wants a contiguous Palestinian state,
3. he wants the Palestinians to recognize Israel's right to exist,
4. he wants the borders to be based on Israel's borders prior to the 1967 war.
Question no. 1: What think ye of these 4 points?
Question no. 2: Do you think Joel 3:1-2 has any application in this situation?
1 For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, 2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.
__________________
Sam also known as Jim Ellis
Apostolic in doctrine
Pentecostal in experience
Charismatic in practice
Non-denominational in affiliation
Inter-denominational in fellowship
|
05-19-2011, 01:55 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
1. Have borders as they were prior to '67 war? I disagree. Jerusalem is Israel's.
2. I think Joel's prophecy has absolutely nothing to do with this issue.
Regards!
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
05-19-2011, 02:08 PM
|
 |
Renewed
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,432
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
1. Have borders as they were prior to '67 war? I disagree. Jerusalem is Israel's.
2. I think Joel's prophecy has absolutely nothing to do with this issue.
Regards!
|
And Israel will never agree to give up Jerusalem. Obama should understand that. Anyone should understand that.
Very suprising statement.
__________________
You can't reach the world with your talents. People are sick and tired of religious talents. People need a Holy Ghost annointed church with real fruits to reach out and touch their lives. ~ Pastor Burrell Crabtree
In fact I think that the insinuation of "hateful" Pentecostals is coming mostly from the fertile imaginations of bitter, backslidden ex Apostolics who are constantly trying to find a way to justify their actions. ~ strait shooter
www.scottysweb.com
www.chrisscottonline.com
|
05-19-2011, 02:12 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,270
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Not surprsiing, IMO given that he is muslim born(the daddy is so he is ) and it aint happening
|
05-19-2011, 02:28 PM
|
|
Renewed
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,432
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Now combine this with the previous thread about the "Palastinian protestor invasion".
The US has long been a supporter of Israel. Now to these protesters the US is appearing to not only back away from that support but validify their claims to the land.
Will this statement from the US encourage the protestor invasion ?
Am I the only one who has to wonder what exactly did Obama believe the ramifications of such a statement would be ? Is our president trying to, "stir the pot" ?
__________________
You can't reach the world with your talents. People are sick and tired of religious talents. People need a Holy Ghost annointed church with real fruits to reach out and touch their lives. ~ Pastor Burrell Crabtree
In fact I think that the insinuation of "hateful" Pentecostals is coming mostly from the fertile imaginations of bitter, backslidden ex Apostolics who are constantly trying to find a way to justify their actions. ~ strait shooter
www.scottysweb.com
www.chrisscottonline.com
|
05-19-2011, 02:56 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In His Hands
Posts: 13,914
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
Today, President Obama gave a speech on Middle East Policy.
Among other things he stated that:
1. he wants two states --Israel and Palestine,
2. he wants a contiguous Palestinian state,
3. he wants the Palestinians to recognize Israel's right to exist,
4. he wants the borders to be based on Israel's borders prior to the 1967 war.
Question no. 1: What think ye of these 4 points?
Question no. 2: Do you think Joel 3:1-2 has any application in this situation?
1 For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, 2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land. |
Question 1:
I agree with the sentiments of the first three points, but the fourth point is not just a dramatic departure from America's past position regarding Jerusalem, it's just plain foolish of him to make that stand on behalf of America when he should know (by default or by advisors) that America as a whole recognize Jerusalem as belonging to Israel.
Point # 4 really makes me angry.
Question 2:
No, I don't think it's applicable as Israel's land had already been parted out long before this event. Biblical Israel is bigger than modern Israel.
I am really disgusted by our President's stance concerning number 4.
__________________
"The choices we make reveal the true nature of our character."
|
05-19-2011, 03:48 PM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
Question 1:
I agree with the sentiments of the first three points, but the fourth point is not just a dramatic departure from America's past position regarding Jerusalem, it's just plain foolish of him to make that stand on behalf of America when he should know (by default or by advisors) that America as a whole recognize Jerusalem as belonging to Israel.
Point # 4 really makes me angry.
Question 2:
No, I don't think it's applicable as Israel's land had already been parted out long before this event. Biblical Israel is bigger than modern Israel.
I am really disgusted by our President's stance concerning number 4.
|
I agree. I am sure the pundits will say he mentioned something about mutual trading of certain areas... but still, just saying this is going to backfire on Obama. He will now be seen as solidly antiIsrael, IMO.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
05-19-2011, 04:08 PM
|
|
Jesus' Name Pentecostal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: near Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,805
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty
Now combine this with the previous thread about the "Palastinian protestor invasion".
The US has long been a supporter of Israel. Now to these protesters the US is appearing to not only back away from that support but validify their claims to the land.
Will this statement from the US encourage the protestor invasion ?
Am I the only one who has to wonder what exactly did Obama believe the ramifications of such a statement would be ? Is our president trying to, "stir the pot" ?
|
Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled for a visit with our President tomorrow.
That may have something to do with the timing of the President's statements.
As I watched the speech, I feared he was going to say that the U.S. is right now recognizing Palestine as a state or that he would say we are going to recognize Palestine on 9/11/2011 in honor of the tenth anniversary of the Muslim attacks on America.
|
05-19-2011, 04:56 PM
|
|
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled for a visit with our President tomorrow.
That may have something to do with the timing of the President's statements.
As I watched the speech, I feared he was going to say that the U.S. is right now recognizing Palestine as a state or that he would say we are going to recognize Palestine on 9/11/2011 in honor of the tenth anniversary of the Muslim attacks on America.
|
The whole thing is warped. No doubt about it.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
05-19-2011, 05:48 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,787
|
|
|
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
Today, President Obama gave a speech on Middle East Policy.
Among other things he stated that:
1. he wants two states --Israel and Palestine,
2. he wants a contiguous Palestinian state,
3. he wants the Palestinians to recognize Israel's right to exist,
4. he wants the borders to be based on Israel's borders prior to the 1967 war.
Question no. 1: What think ye of these 4 points?
Question no. 2: Do you think Joel 3:1-2 has any application in this situation?
1 For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, 2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land. |
Netanyahu is correct in that those borders are "indefensible" particularly in this age. Lebanon is overrun by Radicals and are not a friend. Syria is not a friend. Egypt has a new government and we'll have to wait and see, Palestinians hate Israel and have weapons
The only real solution I can see is to carve out a single area of Israel and Jordan (It used to be a part of Jordan before Israel took it) and move them all there from the Gaza strip and give the Strip to Israel.
That way there is no reason to have to travel through Israel and Israel can close her borders if she wants and not have militants on both sides of her.
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
