Seascapes - what say ye?

rgcraig · #1 05-05-2011, 05:55 PM

Could this be the case?

http://socyberty.com/issues/white-ho...ama-bin-laden/

NorCal · #2 05-05-2011, 06:08 PM

Now we see why he is sitting in the corner hunching. Sad excuse of a man, much less a president.

pelathais · #3 05-05-2011, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NorCal

Now we see why he is sitting in the corner hunching. Sad excuse of a man, much less a president.

It's a difficult job. Not everyone is cut out for it. Maybe he's just "voting 'present'" again. He shows up for the job but doesn't want to go on record until after the dust has settled.

Pressing-On · #4 05-05-2011, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Could this be the case?

http://socyberty.com/issues/white-ho...ama-bin-laden/

Is this a reliable source?

Light · #5 05-05-2011, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Is this a reliable source?

This is a prime example of throwing stinky stuff on the wall just to see if some of the stink will stay. Typical of the right.

pelathais · #6 05-05-2011, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Could this be the case?

http://socyberty.com/issues/white-ho...ama-bin-laden/

What gets me is that Valerie Jarrett - the person who is identified as getting the President to be so indecisive, isn't an anti-terror expert. She isn't an expert in Foreign Policy or military matters.

Valerie Jarrett heads the White House Office of Public Engagement. She's a PR wonk for the President. What's she doing giving input on matters of National Security?

And to top it all off... her Associate Director's position is staffed by people like Kal Penn! That's right. Kal Penn of "Harold and Kumar Get Stoned All the Time" fame was Valerie Jarrett's Associate Director and it was this office that gave the President the input to be so indecisive on this matter that he now wants so much glory for having executed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_H...mental_Affairs

coadie · #7 05-05-2011, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais

What gets me is that Valerie Jarrett - the person who is identified as getting the President to be so indecisive, isn't an anti-terror expert. She isn't an expert in Foreign Policy or military matters.

Valerie Jarrett heads the White House Office of Public Engagement. She's a PR wonk for the President. What's she doing giving input on matters of National Security?

And to top it all off... her Associate Director's position is staffed by people like Kal Penn! That's right. Kal Penn of "Harold and Kumar Get Stoned All the Time" fame was Valerie Jarrett's Associate Director and it was this office that gave the President the input to be so indecisive on this matter that he now wants so much glory for having executed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_H...mental_Affairs

She is from Chicago. Chicago and Detroit are more dangerous than Baghdad.
She is in the same briefings as Obama who also had no military or governance experience.

Pressing-On · #8 05-05-2011, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Light

This is a prime example of throwing stinky stuff on the wall just to see if some of the stink will stay. Typical of the right.

I'm on the right, Light and I check my sources.

I'm sure Renda does as well. I'm not familiar with her link.

NorCal · #9 05-05-2011, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pelathais

It's a difficult job. Not everyone is cut out for it. Maybe he's just "voting 'present'" again. He shows up for the job but doesn't want to go on record until after the dust has settled.

Possible, but he is not even acting like a CEO.

For example, the left claims that Regan's Administration was not really ran by him either. However, Regan ran it like a true CEO: "I hired you guys to be the administrator of that specific agency, make the decision. You know better the I do."

I would not care if BO ran it like that, its more efficient. Just don't lie and say YOU made the decision when obviously you did not. Say "Your Administration" would be proper.