Survey About Doctrinal Beliefs

[RandyWayne]

Originally Posted by pelathais

And yet you engage in just this sort of "ear scratching" yourself. As a pastor, you must have done some study on the issues under discussion here. Salvation by Grace, the Sovereignty of God. Anything ringing a bell for you there?



Since when did your denial of Jesus Christ as both Lord and Savior become a path to "salvation?" Peter denied Jesus and wept. You deny Him and make the cock crowing noise yourself.

You guys ever read the Bible? Go back and engage the preceding posts.

I do believe that Marvin the paranoid android could actually cheer OldPathsII up!

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by Rob McKee

Lying to people isn't loving them. I would rather have my ears hear "well done" than be scratched.

Stay faithful to Jesus, and His work, not fearfully bound in your own, and you'll hear those words. It shouldn't even be a concern if you're resting in His promise.

What is "lying to them?" There's more people lying to themselves and lying to people, justifying it with "it's better safe than sorry."

[Monarchianism]

Originally Posted by pelathais

You're wasting your time. Opie Deuce had no intention of actually engaging anyone who responded to his post and thread. "Hit and Run." It's so characteristic of those who profess to "walk the old paths" - yet they have spent so much time recently editing Manuals and Articles of Faith to disguise just what those "old paths" really were.

They're delusional. Myopic. They have no real love for the "old paths." They just want their ears tickled with whatever is new and trendy in the Good Ol' Boy Network.

I change my mind on if baptism is valid in two ways.
It says to baptize in "the name." That's what we should do.
We should baptize in the name, not titles.

James 1:8 - "A double minded man is unstable in all his ways."

I wouldn't want to be one that baptizes in titles at one Church, then baptize in Jesus at another. If you baptize in titles, you're not baptizing in the name.

Comment to the old paths: I hope those old paths were modest in dress, and didn't pattern their lives after Jezebel.

[Narrow Is The Way]

Originally Posted by OldPathsII

I've expressed some dismay at the heavy criticism here when all I've done is promote the basic Acts2:38 New Birth message. It's basics of belief in repentance, baptism in water in Jesus' name, and the infilling of the Holy Ghost evidenced by speaking with other tongues.

So could I get an idea of what's here at AFF and just see what people believe by asking these questions?

1: Do you believe that water baptism must be done in the name of Jesus and that any other baptism is not a valid baptism?

2: Do you believe that the infilling of the Holy Ghost is evidenced only by speaking with other tongues?

3: Do you believe these things are absolutely necessary in order to be saved and ready for heaven?

4: Do you hold as a core value the basics of traditional pentecostal holiness which is: Men: full length pants, shirts with sleeves, short hair, Women: uncut hair, no makeup, no pants, shirts with sleeves?

5: Do you believe a trinitarian will go to heaven?

1: Do you believe that water baptism must be done in the name of Jesus and that any other baptism is not a valid baptism?
YES I AGREE 100%
2: Do you believe that the infilling of the Holy Ghost is evidenced only by speaking with other tongues?
YES I AGREE 100%
3: Do you believe these things are absolutely necessary in order to be saved and ready for heaven?
YES I DO 100%
4: Do you hold as a core value the basics of traditional pentecostal holiness which is: Men: full length pants, shirts with sleeves, short hair, Women: uncut hair, no makeup, no pants, shirts with LONG sleeves?
ABSOLUTELY BROTHER!!
5: Do you believe a trinitarian will go to heaven?
NO A TRINITARIAN WILL NOT GO TO HEAVEN.

I Hope I have not confused anybody as to where I stand on these questions.

[berkeley]

*yawn

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by berkeley

*yawn