Was it necessary to repeal DADT?

[James Griffin]

Originally Posted by sandie

These laws aren't beng written by nimcompoops....aren't lawyers writing these ballots?

Since when would those two be expressly mutually exclusive?

Especially as pertaining to politicians...

:-)

[DAII]

Originally Posted by Mr. Smith

Yes, you did as well. Great stuff.

Jason is a "friend" and I've tried to answer his points one at a time, but it was a waste of time and all I get out of it is being accused of "promoting sin". I go away from this thinking, "With friends like that........".

And your Romans post was tremendous. Thanks for that.

I do think he owes you an apology.

[sandie]

Originally Posted by James Griffin

Since when would those two be expressly mutually exclusive?

Especially as pertaining to politicians...

:-)

Guess I left that one wide open.

But, I'm just wondering if there will ever be wording that is just right?
I see the will of the people being over-turned.

[Truthseeker]

I just wonder if stuff like same sex marriage, online porn, dope etc.....neans greater demonic strongholds in a society?

[James Griffin]

Originally Posted by sandie

Guess I left that one wide open.

But, I'm just wondering if there will ever be wording that is just right?
I see the will of the people being over-turned.

The Ninth Circuit does seem to be excessively activist at times.

Personally I think the solution in Federal Court would be current scheme for appointment but a non-partisan affirmation vote every 6-8 years by the people in their jurisdiction.

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by James Griffin

In Loving, Virgina passed a law with the express intent of bypassing the equal protection clause. Also naming a legal act commited in another jurisdiction as being illegal and punishable in Virginia.

I can differentiate. :-)

The point can be made that laws outlawing same sex marriage are exactly the same as what Virginia did.

[DAII]

Originally Posted by sandie

Guess I left that one wide open.

But, I'm just wondering if there will ever be wording that is just right?
I see the will of the people being over-turned.

Sometimes the will of the people is deemed unconstitutional, Sandie ... Brown vs. the Board of Education ... thankfully started a tide of legislation that overturned segregation and Jim Crow laws (the will of the people) when they were energized to exercise the tyranny of the majority by means of racism, disgruntled by the results of the Civil war ... and legitimized by the Plessy vs. Ferguson "separate but equal' decision

[Truthseeker]

Originally Posted by DAII

1. DADT was repealed thus it cannot open any door.

2. Same sex marriage is already allowed in various states.

I think we have to be in denial to not think DADT is not the beginning of homosexuals agenda.

I just saw carton with soldiers on a DADT mountain raising a american flag in victory with a same sex marriage mountain next to to be conquered next.

[Truthseeker]

Originally Posted by DAII

Sometimes the will of the people is deemed unconstitutional, Sandie ... Brown vs. the Board of Education ... thankfully started a tide of legislation that overturned segregation and Jim Crow laws (the will of the people) when they were energized to exercise the tyranny of the majority ... and by the Plessy vs. Ferguson decision

Race is alot different then perverted lifestyle.

[sandie]

Originally Posted by Truthseeker

I just wonder if stuff like same sex marriage, online porn, dope etc.....neans greater demonic strongholds in a society?

I get the feeling we're not suppose to mix up spiritual and legal things in this thread. *winks*

Guess I'm just old fashioned, un-enlightened, ill-informed, oh and bigoted....but I still say if society would return to honoring God's will and ways we would reap blessing. Turning away from those things reaps the opposite.