A Theological Tidbit on I Corth. 11:10

[Timmy]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Luke 20:36 (New International Version)
36and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God's children, since they are children of the resurrection.

Ah yes! I forgot about that one. Thanks.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Timmy

Ah yes! I forgot about that one. Thanks.

You didn't think there was one, did ya?

[Timmy]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

You didn't think there was one, did ya?

I said I forgot about it. You win! Sheesh.

[DAII]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Luke 20:36 (New International Version)
36and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God's children, since they are children of the resurrection.

But if the multiple sources are right ... it appears that LS might have been teaching this in the early 80's?

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by DAII

But if the multiple sources are right ... it appears that LS might have been teaching this in the early 80's?

That is exactly what I'm understanding.

Has anyone else heard of this?

[DAII]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

That is exactly what I'm understanding.

Has anyone else heard of this?

If true ... this idea did not remain as part of LS's repertoire.... and evolved to the modern day HMH .... why not?

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by DAII

If true ... this idea did not remain as part of LS's repertoire.... and evolved to the modern day HMH .... why not?

Perhaps he realized he was in error?

[DAII]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Perhaps he realized he was in error?

Hmmm ... I think this is worth delving deeper into .....

[Melody]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I dont believe the UPC would be so foolish as to teach that. Maybe a rogue member but surely no one ordained by them would be that far off or members that would accept it.

agreed

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I dont believe the UPC would be so foolish as to teach that. Maybe a rogue member but surely no one ordained by them would be that far off or members that would accept it.

Originally Posted by Melody

agreed

M & M - I don't see much different in this and the power in the hair doctrine that is being taught today.

Why isn't someone in the UPC saying it's foolish instead of publishing a picture of it in the Herald?