Mooney Guns for "Secret" Meeting in Detroit? - Page 43

rgcraig · #**421** 07-09-2009, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Prax, I think you are more annoying then me on this forum.
I accuse you of being annoying.

I have never accused you of lying while using a false username, see the difference?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Silly, I can see why you are still single!
You need to grow up Prax.

It doesn't excuse the acusation--it provides accountability!

That's a lie Ron.

He's not annoying

And that's not why he's single

And he doesn't need to grow up

Now, are we talking apples and apples?

rgcraig · #**422** 07-09-2009, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Weeelll, if you want to know why AFF is getting a reputation around the web.
There it is, you can post whatever & whether founded or not as long as it agrees with Admin.

Ron, where does that say that?

I do not agree with A LOT of things that are posted here, but we DO ALLOW different views and opinions.

I think you are confusing us with your other forum.

We DO HAVE RULES!

Ron · #**423** 07-09-2009, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

And it's ok for Ron to make personal attacks like this but God forbid someone else do it. It's ok for Ron, because he uses his real name...or so that is the reason he has given us so far.

Ron I am surprised you ARE married or STILL married considering how juvanile you behave at times and how compulsively annoying you can be like a little boy whining for more candy.

Does that bother you because I did it anonymously?

You are being silly Prax!

For someone who is supposedly smart & has a bright mind you either can not see the difference or refuse to.

That is the sad part!

Ron · #**424** 07-09-2009, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

That's a lie Ron.

He's not annoying

And that's not why he's single

And he doesn't need to grow up

Now, are we talking apples and apples?

No & Renda you are shirking the issue.
Others have seen it why can't you?

oletime · #**425** 07-09-2009, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrowingPains

How many commenting on Mooney's alleged words have actually listened to the sermon in its entirety?

i did ,i didnt think it was that controvercial , i just thought he was saying he isnt going anywhere standards wise but is holding to the beliefs that he has always had and i am presuming that his peers and bro urshan taught him. i dont have a problem with that, perhaps he knows more about what was said at this meeting then what he is saying. jmho he certainly isnt radically consevative anti internet and sports etc.

rgcraig · #**426** 07-09-2009, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

No & Renda you are shirking the issue.
Others have seen it why can't you?

Because saying, "I don't believe you" is NOT calling someone a liar.

Ron · #**427** 07-09-2009, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Ron, where does that say that?

I do not agree with A LOT of things that are posted here, but we DO ALLOW different views and opinions.

I think you are confusing us with your other forum.

We DO HAVE RULES!

Those rules are not left to interpretation.
People have made accusations & innuendo without any basis for it besides thier own opinion!

Lying is lying! Casting aspersions on peoples character is still wrong!

Ron · #**428** 07-09-2009, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Because saying, "I don't believe you" is NOT calling someone a liar.

I don't know if that is sad or funny, or both.

It is calling someone a liar.

GrowingPains · #**429** 07-09-2009, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staysharp

I have and was deeply disturbed.

I guess my position hasn't changed, and I listened to the whole thing. While I may disagree with Mooney's overall ideas, he was certainly tasteful, and teaching/preaching to saints about what he perceives is seducing ministers and families away. He was talking about the elephant in the room, and it was entirely appropriate.

People have taken words he said in the sermon's entirety, and suggested they ALL apply to the Detroit crew, which was perhaps a very subtle emphasis during the third point of the "temptations for false doctrine" that he spoke of. I don't think that's a fair assessment.

Ron · #**430** 07-09-2009, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oletime

i did ,i didnt think it was that controvercial , i just thought he was saying he isnt going anywhere standards wise but is holding to the beliefs that he has always had and i am presuming that his peers and bro urshan taught him. i dont have a problem with that, perhaps he knows more about what was said at this meeting then what he is saying. jmho he certainly isnt radically consevative anti internet and sports etc.

That's a few people that heard different things from the message.
Amazing!