Mooney Guns for "Secret" Meeting in Detroit? - Page 11

GrowingPains · #**101** 07-08-2009, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encryptus

????

It looked pretty much on point to me. But I am glad he qualified as to "certain" leaders, I think the ones here in the South Texas District are doing a great job.

South Texas has been involved in the same rumor mill.

moniker · #**102** 07-08-2009, 02:01 PM

"No one can join that organization if he does not keep within the borders of their set doctrines. If one should go ahead of their creed, as he is led by the Holy Spirit, he is cast out and proclaimed dangerous."

Andrew D. Urshan The Almighty God in the Lord Jesus Christ 125-6

Encryptus · #**103** 07-08-2009, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrowingPains

South Texas has been involved in the same rumor mill.

I really have not seen that from Bernard or his Asst Shaw. They also had their own small meeting to discuss concerns with young ministers in West Houston at Scott Lewis's church recently. BTW deliberately small.

Encryptus · #**104** 07-08-2009, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moniker

"No one can join that organization if he does not keep within the borders of their set doctrines. If one should go ahead of their creed, as he is led by the Holy Spirit, he is cast out and proclaimed dangerous."

Andrew D. Urshan The Almighty God in the Lord Jesus Christ 125-6

And which set DOCTRINES are not being kept? Which legacy is been violated? When men are seeking to return to the original agreement in 1945 who is truly betraying the founders intent and who is continuing to move the landmarks?

GrowingPains · #**105** 07-08-2009, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encryptus

I really have not seen that from Bernard or his Asst Shaw. They also had their own small meeting to discuss concerns with young ministers in West Houston at Scott Lewis's church recently. BTW deliberately small.

Secret meetings?

Some of them Houston/San Antonio/Austin churches causes friction in the Lonestar state?

Ron · #**106** 07-08-2009, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encryptus

Unfortunately Ron, Scott is way too broadbrush. A lot of the ones I personally know who were there 9and are second or third generation) have gone out and started new assemblies on their own. It seems like a whole lot of attempts to grasp at straws to discredit these guys. Sad really.

Bro Scott wasn't preaching---Bro Mooney was & he knocked it out of the park.
What Bro Scott was saying was the same things Bro Mooney was Preaching in the message (it was awesome) was the exact things that God had already been speaking to him about.
God has been doing the same for me.

Have you listened to the message?

rgcraig · #**107** 07-08-2009, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin

Has anyone thought about contacting those who were rumored to be involved about obtaining information or meeting minutes...?

Why? Is it really everyone's business?

rgcraig · #**108** 07-08-2009, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrowingPains

Not at all -- it's exactly what we are talking about here!

MikeinAR · #**109** 07-08-2009, 02:19 PM

I clicked on the link to hear the sermon and I don't see any way to access it. Has it been removed?

GrowingPains · #**110** 07-08-2009, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encryptus

And which set DOCTRINES are not being kept? Which legacy is been violated? When men are seeking to return to the original agreement in 1945 who is truly betraying the founders intent and who is continuing to move the landmarks?

The restorationists will tell you that the true landmarks are Pentecost, and that we are changing and moving closer to that. They wouldn't use 1945 as their benchmark.